<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <id>http://www.cocomment.com/comments/riffraff</id>
    <title>coComments related to riffraff</title>
    <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/comments/riffraff"/>
    <rights>Copyright 2007 coComment.com</rights>
    <updated>2009-11-25T15:49:13.862+01:00</updated>
    <icon>http://www.cocomment.com/images/logo4rss.gif</icon>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=riffraff&amp;conv=882914&amp;comment_id=17112497</id>
        <title>I read something like "if you </title>
        <author>
            <name>riffraff</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=riffraff&amp;conv=882914&amp;comment_id=17112497"/>
        <content>I read something like "if you still use php4 you deserve problems" once..
I would exclude the fork part, if someone is a developer good enough to manage a php4 fork by her/himself s/he wouldn't be using it by this time, I believe.</content>
        <published>2007-07-13T13:56:01.124+02:00</published>
        <updated>2007-07-13T13:56:01.124+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=riffraff&amp;conv=866518&amp;comment_id=16825067</id>
        <title>cappottante mo me scarico na s</title>
        <author>
            <name>rffrff</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=riffraff&amp;conv=866518&amp;comment_id=16825067"/>
        <content>cappottante mo me scarico na serata</content>
        <published>2007-07-07T13:53:52.915+02:00</published>
        <updated>2007-07-07T13:53:52.915+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=riffraff&amp;conv=618996&amp;comment_id=11926155</id>
        <title>ottima idea, forse dal punto d</title>
        <author>
            <name>riffraff</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=riffraff&amp;conv=618996&amp;comment_id=11926155"/>
        <content>ottima idea, forse dal punto di vista delle risorse andrebbero aggiunte stampanti/fotocopiatrici e gruppi di continuità. 

Ma perché nei pressi della sapienza?</content>
        <published>2007-04-11T18:42:16.277+02:00</published>
        <updated>2007-04-11T18:42:16.277+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=riffraff&amp;conv=529485&amp;comment_id=9845604</id>
        <title>"matteo" non è un link, temo..</title>
        <author>
            <name>riffraff</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=riffraff&amp;conv=529485&amp;comment_id=9845604"/>
        <content>"matteo" non è un link, temo..</content>
        <published>2007-03-07T02:23:11.028+01:00</published>
        <updated>2007-03-07T02:23:11.028+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=riffraff&amp;conv=472433&amp;comment_id=8550771</id>
        <title>imo gimmie è una ottima idea e</title>
        <author>
            <name>riffraff</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=riffraff&amp;conv=472433&amp;comment_id=8550771"/>
        <content>imo gimmie è una ottima idea e piuttosto innovativa. 
Ed anche l'integrazione pervasiva della ricerca (da spotlight in poi) è una cosa interessante e che in molti modi cambia l'interazione col computer.</content>
        <published>2007-02-12T16:15:26.616+01:00</published>
        <updated>2007-02-12T16:15:26.616+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
</feed>
