<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <id>http://www.cocomment.com/comments/Pheisty</id>
    <title>coComments related to Pheisty</title>
    <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/comments/Pheisty"/>
    <rights>Copyright 2007 coComment.com</rights>
    <updated>2009-11-23T20:57:05.358+01:00</updated>
    <icon>http://www.cocomment.com/images/logo4rss.gif</icon>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=Pheisty&amp;conv=1179152&amp;comment_id=23068444</id>
        <title>Spawn,

Your right.  The frien</title>
        <author>
            <name>Joey</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=Pheisty&amp;conv=1179152&amp;comment_id=23068444"/>
        <content>Spawn,

Your right.  The friend comment was out-of-line and I read your statement too fast and got the wrong impression.  My apologies.

But as far as the private property comment, you have no valid argument against it.  I have yet to hear one statement from you about private property rights that holds water.  

As for the black market, YES, bans do cause black markets.  Look at drugs, look at Al Capone and bootlegging...</content>
        <published>2008-01-11T13:54:56.433+01:00</published>
        <updated>2008-01-11T13:54:56.433+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
</feed>
