<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <id>http://www.cocomment.com/comments/smalbizblogwiz</id>
    <title>coComments related to smalbizblogwiz</title>
    <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/comments/smalbizblogwiz"/>
    <rights>Copyright 2007 coComment.com</rights>
    <updated>2009-11-26T07:02:53.292+01:00</updated>
    <icon>http://www.cocomment.com/images/logo4rss.gif</icon>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=smalbizblogwiz&amp;conv=423113&amp;comment_id=7107899</id>
        <title>Huge potential - terrible exec</title>
        <author>
            <name>Cortland Coleman</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=smalbizblogwiz&amp;conv=423113&amp;comment_id=7107899"/>
        <content>Huge potential - terrible execution.

They turned a great majority of their own community against them.

They jettisoned their most useful service (PFF, or ScribeFire), the future of which now seems to be in flux.

DeadPool.</content>
        <published>2007-01-23T07:27:14.320+01:00</published>
        <updated>2007-01-23T07:27:14.320+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=smalbizblogwiz&amp;conv=418463&amp;comment_id=6927597</id>
        <title>So, the story (or actually, th</title>
        <author>
            <name>Cortland Coleman</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=smalbizblogwiz&amp;conv=418463&amp;comment_id=6927597"/>
        <content>So, the story (or actually, the Headline) goes from "Geni Blew It" to "Geni Overwhelmed..."? I know there are no hard-and-fast rules or mandatory "journalistic standards" on blogs but it seems that the headline was changed only after some basic fact-checking was done. That's fine, but awkward. Some folks would advise TC to check the facts first THEN write the sensational headline. The approach taken on this post reeks of the "shoot first, ask questions later" method.

Deleted comments from relevant but anonymous commenters yesterday, significant headline revision today; can't wait to see what tomorrow holds on TC. Maybe it's just something in the Silicon Valley water this weekend...</content>
        <published>2007-01-21T07:05:14.784+01:00</published>
        <updated>2007-01-21T07:05:14.784+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=smalbizblogwiz&amp;conv=416355&amp;comment_id=6815214</id>
        <title>Interesting and potentially po</title>
        <author>
            <name>Cortland Coleman</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=smalbizblogwiz&amp;conv=416355&amp;comment_id=6815214"/>
        <content>Interesting and potentially powerful parnership. Both companies have appealing services and integration makes great sense for these two.

I've recently switched to FilesAnywhere. They have a mile-long feature list (including auto-backups, simple drive mapping, drop-boxes for other people, etc.), it appears they've been in business for a while and their power user/workgroup options are impressive. It is a fee-based service but the prices are reasonable, and most importantly, their service is (seems) reliable, fast and easy, and I've tried almost every storage company reviewed on TC.</content>
        <published>2007-01-20T03:04:02.679+01:00</published>
        <updated>2007-01-20T03:04:02.679+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
</feed>
