<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <id>http://www.cocomment.com/comments/bazil749</id>
    <title>coComments related to bazil749</title>
    <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/comments/bazil749"/>
    <rights>Copyright 2007 coComment.com</rights>
    <updated>2009-11-22T12:23:20.536+01:00</updated>
    <icon>http://www.cocomment.com/images/logo4rss.gif</icon>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=bazil749&amp;conv=1364821&amp;comment_id=25869835</id>
        <title>It's a simple numbers game act</title>
        <author>
            <name>Baz L</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=bazil749&amp;conv=1364821&amp;comment_id=25869835"/>
        <content>It's a simple numbers game actually. The stats on 800x600 sites come at about under 3%, the last time I checked.

But, this question has no right/wrong answer. It all depends on design time, target audience, design type, etc.

If you've got the time, then I guess you can try a fluid design. I don't like them, because they tend to stretch out too wide sometimes. Also, I'm just lazy that way.

For general business websites, I tend to go with a smaller width, since the audience is wider and may include lil' old grandmas with 5 year old computers. On blogs and graphical sites, I go a bit wider, sine the audience would be expected to have slightly newer PCs.

Type of design also plays a big role. More graphical sites tend to demand a larger display.</content>
        <published>2008-04-28T05:10:03.606+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-04-28T05:10:03.606+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=bazil749&amp;conv=1164358&amp;comment_id=22883379</id>
        <title>I don't get it.

What I was re</title>
        <author>
            <name>Baz L</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=bazil749&amp;conv=1164358&amp;comment_id=22883379"/>
        <content>I don't get it.

What I was referring to is that with these guarantees, most hosts offer some refund or duration of free hosting or upgrade if they don't deliver on the uptime guarantee...

What I was asking (joking rather) is that here there's nothing to give back.</content>
        <published>2007-12-31T19:31:15.468+01:00</published>
        <updated>2007-12-31T19:31:15.468+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=bazil749&amp;conv=1164358&amp;comment_id=22857123</id>
        <title>Here's my question: They promi</title>
        <author>
            <name>Baz L</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=bazil749&amp;conv=1164358&amp;comment_id=22857123"/>
        <content>Here's my question: They promise 99.9% uptime. If they don't deliver on that promise, what do you get? :)

I'm only asking, cuz they're down right now.</content>
        <published>2007-12-30T22:32:28.522+01:00</published>
        <updated>2007-12-30T22:32:28.522+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=bazil749&amp;conv=989557&amp;comment_id=18664516</id>
        <title>If you and that person share c</title>
        <author>
            <name>Baz L</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=bazil749&amp;conv=989557&amp;comment_id=18664516"/>
        <content>If you and that person share common interests, sure. If you're in a place like New York or other big city where rent is ridiculous, yep.

But down here in the TX, not really. I work from 8:00 to 5:00 (sometimes later) every day. Last month we hit 100 degrees a couple of days, so my electricity bill was a whopping $44.00 (yes the decimal is in the right place), I don't think I could have pulled this off with a roommate.</content>
        <published>2007-09-06T07:53:20.342+02:00</published>
        <updated>2007-09-06T07:53:20.342+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=bazil749&amp;conv=989554&amp;comment_id=18664512</id>
        <title>Happy Birthday.

Someone needs</title>
        <author>
            <name>Baz L</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=bazil749&amp;conv=989554&amp;comment_id=18664512"/>
        <content>Happy Birthday.

Someone needs to tell Geico about that 25 thing. I just turned 25 and got nothing. I called up they told me about 26, so I'm shopping for insurance.

Sorry for the rant,
Happy Birthday again.</content>
        <published>2007-09-06T07:50:29.844+02:00</published>
        <updated>2007-09-06T07:50:29.844+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=bazil749&amp;conv=924727&amp;comment_id=17896959</id>
        <title>In my experience Wordpress doe</title>
        <author>
            <name>Baz L</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=bazil749&amp;conv=924727&amp;comment_id=17896959"/>
        <content>In my experience Wordpress doesn't change the URL if the title changes.

What I've noticed is that when you first post, it saves the URL in the "slug" field. After that it doesn't change unless you manually change it or delete it and make Wordpress recreate it.

Also, it's not necessary to append the post ID to your URL. If there's a matching post with the same title (and there for same URL) Wordpress sticks in a 2, then 3, etc.

Maybe you're on an older version?
--
Baz L
&lt;a href="http://www.LifeOfBaz.com"&gt;Day In The Life of Baz&lt;/a&gt;</content>
        <published>2007-07-29T09:40:24.885+02:00</published>
        <updated>2007-07-29T09:40:24.885+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
</feed>
