<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <id>http://www.cocomment.com/comments/halbluchs</id>
    <title>coComments related to halbluchs</title>
    <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/comments/halbluchs"/>
    <rights>Copyright 2007 coComment.com</rights>
    <updated>2009-11-22T07:51:19.622+01:00</updated>
    <icon>http://www.cocomment.com/images/logo4rss.gif</icon>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=halbluchs&amp;conv=1416955&amp;comment_id=27036274</id>
        <title>Da gab's vor ein paar Monaten </title>
        <author>
            <name>Nico</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=halbluchs&amp;conv=1416955&amp;comment_id=27036274"/>
        <content>Da gab's vor ein paar Monaten doch schon eine ganz ähnliche Geschichte, in der Cory Doctorow sich vorstellte, was passieren würde, &lt;a href="http://www.radaronline.com/from-the-magazine/2007/09/google_fiction_evil_dangerous_surveillance_control_1.php"&gt;wenn Google plötzlich böse wird.&lt;/a&gt;</content>
        <published>2008-06-03T08:30:39.724+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-06-03T08:30:39.724+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=halbluchs&amp;conv=1407689&amp;comment_id=26840266</id>
        <title>@Matthias: Es ist ganz untersc</title>
        <author>
            <name>Nico</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=halbluchs&amp;conv=1407689&amp;comment_id=26840266"/>
        <content>@Matthias: Es ist ganz unterschiedlich und selten vorhersehbar. Der Lebenslauf 2.0-Eintrag hat erstaunlich viele Reaktionen ausgelöst. Aber grundsätzlich glaube ich, dass reine "Recherche-Posts" - also die Leser um Fakten, Informationen, Kontakte bitten - weniger gut funktionieren als Einträge, die zur Diskussion einladen. Das Rundmail als Recherchetool bleibt deshalb wohl unersetzlich.</content>
        <published>2008-05-27T12:38:40.788+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-05-27T12:38:40.788+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=halbluchs&amp;conv=1373690&amp;comment_id=26281857</id>
        <title>Zusätzlich würde ich noch &lt;a h</title>
        <author>
            <name>Nico</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=halbluchs&amp;conv=1373690&amp;comment_id=26281857"/>
        <content>Zusätzlich würde ich noch &lt;a href="http://www.yigg.de"&gt;Yigg&lt;/a&gt; und &lt;a href="http://www.rivva.de"&gt;Rivva&lt;/a&gt; empfehlen, die deutschsprachigen Entsprechungen von Digg und Techmeme.</content>
        <published>2008-04-30T16:57:20.834+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-04-30T16:57:20.834+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=halbluchs&amp;conv=1341237&amp;comment_id=25297973</id>
        <title>Well, I'm flattered to be incl</title>
        <author>
            <name>Nico</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=halbluchs&amp;conv=1341237&amp;comment_id=25297973"/>
        <content>Well, I'm flattered to be included in Paul's list - but of course, there are many other german (online) media blogs that are worth reading. Here are some of my favourites:

&lt;a href="http://www.medienspiegel.ch"&gt;Medienspiegel&lt;/a&gt; - mandatory if you're a journalist in Switzerland.

&lt;a href="http://www.medienlese.com"&gt;Medienlese&lt;/a&gt; - covering mostly Swiss and German online media.

&lt;a href="http://www.stefan-niggemeier.de"&gt;Stefan Niggemeier&lt;/a&gt; - Niggemeier is one of the founders of the media watchblog &lt;a href="http://www.bildblog.de"&gt;Bildblog&lt;/a&gt;, this is his personal blog.

&lt;a href="http://blog.handelsblatt.de/indiskretion/"&gt;Indiskretion Ehrensache&lt;/a&gt; - Thomas Knüwer, who is also a reporter for the newspaper Handelsblatt, is one of the few German print journalists who also blogs.

&lt;a href="http://medienkonvergenz.com"&gt;Beobachtungen zur Medienkonvergenz&lt;/a&gt; - An irregularly updated, but truly excellent Swiss blog about social media and technology convergence.

I'm sure I'm forgetting some, but it's a start...</content>
        <published>2008-04-10T11:50:29.386+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-04-10T11:50:29.386+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=halbluchs&amp;conv=1281810&amp;comment_id=24622577</id>
        <title>@mds: Das heisst wohl, dass je</title>
        <author>
            <name>Nico</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=halbluchs&amp;conv=1281810&amp;comment_id=24622577"/>
        <content>@mds: Das heisst wohl, dass jemand persoenlich.com den Link zu diesem Artikel geschickt hat, weil sie nicht selber drauf gekommen wären :-)

Und ich stimme Ronnie zu: Der Blick am Abend ist wohl der Anfang vom Ende des bezahlten Blick. Das kann man als Kapitulation des Boulevardblattes betrachten - aber auch als schlaue Strategieänderung, denn ein Gratis-Blick hat wohl tatsächlich das Potenzial, die Vormachtstellung von "20 Minuten" ins Wanken zu bringen.</content>
        <published>2008-03-04T19:10:17.291+01:00</published>
        <updated>2008-03-04T19:10:17.291+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=halbluchs&amp;conv=1246220&amp;comment_id=24095987</id>
        <title>I completely agree with Mark -</title>
        <author>
            <name>Nico Luchsinger</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=halbluchs&amp;conv=1246220&amp;comment_id=24095987"/>
        <content>I completely agree with Mark - link within the story whenever you can. The only links I'd put at the end of the story are links to related stories.

The website of the Swiss newspaper I used to work for usually does not link within the story. There was, however, no clear policy when I worked there - if you wanted, you could use in-text links.</content>
        <published>2008-02-13T10:49:25.884+01:00</published>
        <updated>2008-02-13T10:49:25.884+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=halbluchs&amp;conv=1202437&amp;comment_id=23426850</id>
        <title>Mich würde eure Meinung zu &lt;a </title>
        <author>
            <name>Nico</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=halbluchs&amp;conv=1202437&amp;comment_id=23426850"/>
        <content>Mich würde eure Meinung zu &lt;a href="http://www.moreintelligentlife.com"&gt;"Intelligent Life"&lt;/a&gt; interessieren...</content>
        <published>2008-01-23T08:49:57.386+01:00</published>
        <updated>2008-01-23T08:49:57.386+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=halbluchs&amp;conv=1195340&amp;comment_id=23322182</id>
        <title>Just saw that over at Lunch ov</title>
        <author>
            <name>nicoluchsinger</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=halbluchs&amp;conv=1195340&amp;comment_id=23322182"/>
        <content>Just saw that over at Lunch over IP, the managing editor of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch &lt;a href="http://www.lunchoverip.com/2008/01/using-twitter-i.html"&gt;wrote a post&lt;/a&gt; on how they have been using Twitter to cover the construction shutdown of a freeway. The conclusion: "Twitter has specific strengths that make it an asset in covering certain types of stories -- where immediate micro-information is very relevant to the readers -- while in other cases, it might not be worth taking the time to add it to your coverage arsenal."</content>
        <published>2008-01-19T15:14:39.041+01:00</published>
        <updated>2008-01-19T15:14:39.041+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=halbluchs&amp;conv=1166939&amp;comment_id=22934403</id>
        <title>Great post, Paul! I like your </title>
        <author>
            <name>Nico</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=halbluchs&amp;conv=1166939&amp;comment_id=22934403"/>
        <content>Great post, Paul! I like your distinction between pulling, pushing and passing on - it instantly brings order to the online distribution chaos.

Maybe a word about Twitter: One of the reasons why I think Twitter could become an important tool for online journalism is that it can be used as a distribution tool in all three categories.

First, for picking up: News sites should build their own Twitter channels where they distribute news. And again, the same thing that you said about RSS and E-Mail is true: Different technologies require different uses. It's not enough for the sites to just stream their RSS feed into a Twitter channel. But if they do it right, they can possibly reach a bigger audience with little effort.

Second, tuning in: Twitter actually is a sort of asynchronous chat - so why not use it that way? Journalists can ask readers for questions for an upcoming interview (&amp;lt; a href="http://blog.handelsblatt.de/indiskretion/"&amp;gt;Thomas Knuewer in Germany has done it a few times, apparently it worked well) or even have entire conversations with guests on Twitter, giving readers the possibility to participate.

And finally, passing on: Of course, Twitter is a also a great recommendation tool; I discover a lot of great content from tweets. If journalists become part of the online community, blogging, commenting and twittering, chances are that they are not only increasing traffic to their content, but that they also stumble upon a lot of interesting stuff.</content>
        <published>2008-01-02T15:16:11.571+01:00</published>
        <updated>2008-01-02T15:16:11.571+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=halbluchs&amp;conv=1153211&amp;comment_id=22661052</id>
        <title>Gut gebrüllt, Löwe :-)

Google</title>
        <author>
            <name>Nico</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=halbluchs&amp;conv=1153211&amp;comment_id=22661052"/>
        <content>Gut gebrüllt, Löwe :-)

Googles Produkte wirken tatsächlich manchmal, als wenn sie direkt aus der Bastelwerkstatt kämen. Und die Einführung neuer Funktionen ist manchmal etwas gar, äh, bedächtig: 

Da hatte Google zum Beispiel vor einiger Zeit mit &lt;a href="http://gears.google.com/"&gt;Google Gears&lt;/a&gt; eine wirklich geniale Idee. Google selber hat das Ding bis jetzt aber nur gerade bei ihrem RSS-Reader implementiert, und nicht etwa in GMail oder in ihre Web-Office-Applikationen - Konkurrent Zoho hingegen hat das schon &lt;a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/zoho_on_gears.php"&gt;längst geschafft.&lt;/a&gt;</content>
        <published>2007-12-19T18:57:37.331+01:00</published>
        <updated>2007-12-19T18:57:37.331+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=halbluchs&amp;conv=1142333&amp;comment_id=22516577</id>
        <title>Ich halte das Verbot, Wikipedi</title>
        <author>
            <name>Nico</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=halbluchs&amp;conv=1142333&amp;comment_id=22516577"/>
        <content>Ich halte das Verbot, Wikipedia in einer Diplomarbeit zu zitieren, für richtig. Das heisst nicht, dass ich Wikipedia nicht eine tolle Sache finden würde - die meisten Studis, ich eingeschlossen, wären ohne das Ding inzwischen völlig aufgeschmissen. Aber auch wenn die Jekami-Enzyklopädie in Vergleichen alles von Brockhaus bis zu Britannica schlägt: Ein Restrisiko, dass die angebotenen Informationen, zumindest zeitweilig, völliger Humbug sind, bleibt. Und dieses Risiko darf eine wissenschaftliche Arbeit nicht eingehen. Deshalb: Wikipedia konsultieren, um einen ersten Einblick in ein Thema zu erhalten oder weiterführende Literatur zu finden - jederzeit. Aber als Quelle hat Wikipedia in einer Diplomarbeit nichts zu suchen.</content>
        <published>2007-12-11T12:35:16.049+01:00</published>
        <updated>2007-12-11T12:35:16.049+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=halbluchs&amp;conv=970245&amp;comment_id=18413230</id>
        <title>Scott Karp over at Publishing2</title>
        <author>
            <name>Nico</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=halbluchs&amp;conv=970245&amp;comment_id=18413230"/>
        <content>Scott Karp over at Publishing2.0 &lt;a href="http://publishing2.com/2007/08/18/the-problem-with-friends-on-the-social-graph/"&gt;wrote about the same topic&lt;/a&gt;. I totally agree, and I'm kind of surprised that most social networking sites don't offer more tools to define your relationships more precisely. Being able to share certain information only with certain "friends" would make the sites much more useful...</content>
        <published>2007-08-24T18:35:28.578+02:00</published>
        <updated>2007-08-24T18:35:28.578+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=halbluchs&amp;conv=821338&amp;comment_id=16130709</id>
        <title>this is just a test</title>
        <author>
            <name>Nico</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=halbluchs&amp;conv=821338&amp;comment_id=16130709"/>
        <content>this is just a test</content>
        <published>2007-06-23T10:59:21.336+02:00</published>
        <updated>2007-06-23T10:59:21.336+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
</feed>
