<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <id>http://www.cocomment.com/comments/lars3loff</id>
    <title>coComments related to lars3loff</title>
    <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/comments/lars3loff"/>
    <rights>Copyright 2007 coComment.com</rights>
    <updated>2009-11-26T04:33:44.493+01:00</updated>
    <icon>http://www.cocomment.com/images/logo4rss.gif</icon>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=lars3loff&amp;conv=738550&amp;comment_id=14383818</id>
        <title>It makes sense not to generate</title>
        <author>
            <name>Lars Trieloff</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=lars3loff&amp;conv=738550&amp;comment_id=14383818"/>
        <content>It makes sense not to generate any application Javascript on the server side. Instead, Javascript files that form the client application should be delivered statically (with good caching) and exchange with the server should only include data requests. A resource requested can then be represented using XML or JSON (this is an exception where generating Javascript on server makes sense, but there are also very good frameworks for this purpose)

What language is used at server side is not relevant, as long as the web application framework is able to create multiple views of a resource, e.g. the HTML view, the RSS view and the JSON view.</content>
        <published>2007-05-22T19:35:18.892+02:00</published>
        <updated>2007-05-22T19:35:18.892+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
</feed>
