<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <id>http://www.cocomment.com/comments/patachon</id>
    <title>coComments related to patachon</title>
    <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/comments/patachon"/>
    <rights>Copyright 2007 coComment.com</rights>
    <updated>2009-11-22T11:39:32.213+01:00</updated>
    <icon>http://www.cocomment.com/images/logo4rss.gif</icon>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=patachon&amp;conv=831847&amp;comment_id=16218121</id>
        <title>However you want to define "pu</title>
        <author>
            <name>leo</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=patachon&amp;conv=831847&amp;comment_id=16218121"/>
        <content>However you want to define "publishing", I think this points to a more basic question, namely, one on integrity.

To get someone to pay you for your endorsement doesn't sound right whether you're a blogger or not.

How would this go down if instead of a "publisher", I did procurement for a company  or, extending the analogy a step, prescribed drugs for my patients, etc.?

Best to avoid this kind of thing in the first place.  The intentions can be misconstrued no matter what you do.</content>
        <published>2007-06-25T09:35:01.294+02:00</published>
        <updated>2007-06-25T09:35:01.294+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
</feed>
