<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <id>http://www.cocomment.com/comments/dannie</id>
    <title>coComments related to dannie</title>
    <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/comments/dannie"/>
    <rights>Copyright 2007 coComment.com</rights>
    <updated>2009-11-25T15:46:27.679+01:00</updated>
    <icon>http://www.cocomment.com/images/logo4rss.gif</icon>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=dannie&amp;conv=394332&amp;comment_id=5917547</id>
        <title>But why is the threat bigger t</title>
        <author>
            <name>Dannie Jost</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=dannie&amp;conv=394332&amp;comment_id=5917547"/>
        <content>But why is the threat bigger that the move? Clearly, almost logically, you can not have just leaders, somebody oughta follow.

So, if the future - a word that really gives me the creeps - was not for profit, what would it be about? Commercial operations might these days be spelled evil, but what is it that we are not addressing in addressing what is behind the open source idea?</content>
        <published>2007-01-11T14:47:07.694+01:00</published>
        <updated>2007-01-11T14:47:07.694+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
</feed>
