<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <id>http://www.cocomment.com/comments/dahowlett</id>
    <title>coComments related to dahowlett</title>
    <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/comments/dahowlett"/>
    <rights>Copyright 2007 coComment.com</rights>
    <updated>2009-11-23T18:40:08.886+01:00</updated>
    <icon>http://www.cocomment.com/images/logo4rss.gif</icon>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=dahowlett&amp;conv=449001&amp;comment_id=8076817</id>
        <title>Clay precedes his remarks by s</title>
        <author>
            <name>Dennis Howlett</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=dahowlett&amp;conv=449001&amp;comment_id=8076817"/>
        <content>Clay precedes his remarks by saying OSS has been a huge success. I read his take as based on a statistical comparison with the total number of projects compared with those that are successful using the criteria stated. 

It is measurable given the Sourceforge data. I agree it could have been worded better. I think the point he makes is a good one though that OSS operates like a form of Darwinian natural selection. Although that metaphor is capable of being argued as well. 

It would have been interesting to see him argue this from a Long Tail perspective. If that's possible.</content>
        <published>2007-02-02T17:31:10.379+01:00</published>
        <updated>2007-02-02T17:31:10.379+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=dahowlett&amp;conv=428592&amp;comment_id=7302171</id>
        <title>I REALLY want to hear about th</title>
        <author>
            <name>Dennis Howlett</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=dahowlett&amp;conv=428592&amp;comment_id=7302171"/>
        <content>I REALLY want to hear about that!</content>
        <published>2007-01-25T07:46:25.239+01:00</published>
        <updated>2007-01-25T07:46:25.239+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=dahowlett&amp;conv=425835&amp;comment_id=7198448</id>
        <title>Geoff: Far be it for me to be </title>
        <author>
            <name>Dennis Howlett</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=dahowlett&amp;conv=425835&amp;comment_id=7198448"/>
        <content>Geoff: Far be it for me to be a professional 'agony aunt' but there comes a point where most people realise that being a wage slave is a thoroughly miserable idea. 

It's at that point they either break out into Global Microbrand territory or gravitate upwards towards The Borg aka Big4. Your choice my friend.</content>
        <published>2007-01-24T05:06:33.244+01:00</published>
        <updated>2007-01-24T05:06:33.244+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=dahowlett&amp;conv=21284&amp;comment_id=33692</id>
        <title>There is a much more important</title>
        <author>
            <name>Dennis Howlett</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=dahowlett&amp;conv=21284&amp;comment_id=33692"/>
        <content>There is a much more important issue here. I've read both sides of the 'argument' and they read like two strangers trying to tell the same story. Both cannot be right. 

There doesn't seem to be any basis for agreement. If, as seems the case, this has become a legal wrangle, then the worst possible place to try and rsolve it is in the court of public opinion. And in that sense, I'd say both sides have made grave errors of judgment. Grays by pushing it into the public domain in the first place and Winer for responding. 

How on earth that mess gets sorted out is anyones guess. The real winners will likely be the lawyers. As usual in he said/he said arguments.</content>
        <published>2006-03-17T01:52:50.074+01:00</published>
        <updated>2006-03-17T01:52:50.074+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=dahowlett&amp;conv=1746&amp;comment_id=6754</id>
        <title>Another thing - yes unmoderate</title>
        <author>
            <name>text</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=dahowlett&amp;conv=1746&amp;comment_id=6754"/>
        <content>Another thing - yes unmoderated comments appear in your sidebar. That needs resolving mthinks. Also, they could do with truncating comments - too much clutter in the sidebar.</content>
        <published>2006-02-12T06:42:49.494+01:00</published>
        <updated>2006-02-12T06:42:49.494+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=dahowlett&amp;conv=1746&amp;comment_id=6752</id>
        <title>You're comment over at the CoC</title>
        <author>
            <name>text</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=dahowlett&amp;conv=1746&amp;comment_id=6752"/>
        <content>You're comment over at the CoCo forum about potential libel raises an interesting point worth pursuing here. Where a site is moderated, the comment appears in RSS/Co-Comment but is held in the moderation queue of the relevant site. This is barmy. If the site owner is concerned about potential libel, defamation and so on then I'm agin a comment appearing in my sidebar (for example) prior to moderation. And that's before we talk about spam. I'll likely take Co-Comment off my sidebar pretty soon and just keep RSS.</content>
        <published>2006-02-12T06:37:51.089+01:00</published>
        <updated>2006-02-12T06:37:51.089+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
</feed>
