<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <id>http://www.cocomment.com/comments/slmader</id>
    <title>coComments related to slmader</title>
    <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/comments/slmader"/>
    <rights>Copyright 2007 coComment.com</rights>
    <updated>2009-11-24T07:02:43.322+01:00</updated>
    <icon>http://www.cocomment.com/images/logo4rss.gif</icon>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=slmader&amp;conv=1218498&amp;comment_id=23702053</id>
        <title>Congratulations Susan! I think</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stewart Mader</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=slmader&amp;conv=1218498&amp;comment_id=23702053"/>
        <content>Congratulations Susan! I think the best blogs are written by the people out there applying technology in real world organizations. Your blog is invaluable.

Cheers,
Stewart</content>
        <published>2008-02-01T01:14:17.843+01:00</published>
        <updated>2008-02-01T01:14:17.843+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=slmader&amp;conv=1154878&amp;comment_id=22670150</id>
        <title>&lt;blockquote&gt;In my terms, its n</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stewart Mader</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=slmader&amp;conv=1154878&amp;comment_id=22670150"/>
        <content>&lt;blockquote&gt;In my terms, its not spamming. You might have a different definition for link spam :).&lt;/blockquote&gt;

LOL. Of course it wouldn't be link spam in his terms! He really didn't try very hard to give you a creative answer here.

Needless to say, after getting several inquiries like this myself, I'm not convinced either.</content>
        <published>2007-12-21T00:00:58.824+01:00</published>
        <updated>2007-12-21T00:00:58.824+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=slmader&amp;conv=625396&amp;comment_id=12320716</id>
        <title>Maggie,
Concerning the looking</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stewart Mader</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=slmader&amp;conv=625396&amp;comment_id=12320716"/>
        <content>Maggie,
Concerning the looking-at-speaker vs. looking-at-screen question, one idea might be to scrap the screen altogether and have ppl in the audience look at the sites you're discussing right on their laptops. They're probably looking there anyway if they're live-blogging or taking notes, and I think it's becoming more and more natural to look at your laptop during a presentation so why not tak advantage of it?
 
Thanks for mentioning Wikipatterns! I appreciate that you're helping spread the word!
Stewart Mader
Wiki Evangelist, Atlassian</content>
        <published>2007-04-18T04:50:12.342+02:00</published>
        <updated>2007-04-18T04:50:12.342+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
</feed>
