<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <id>http://www.cocomment.com/comments/alicam</id>
    <title>coComments related to alicam</title>
    <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/comments/alicam"/>
    <rights>Copyright 2007 coComment.com</rights>
    <updated>2009-11-24T11:41:43.973+01:00</updated>
    <icon>http://www.cocomment.com/images/logo4rss.gif</icon>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=alicam&amp;conv=618592&amp;comment_id=18851322</id>
        <title>Malcolm, of course I do... but</title>
        <author>
            <name>Alister Cameron</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=alicam&amp;conv=618592&amp;comment_id=18851322"/>
        <content>Malcolm, of course I do... but what has that got to do with this post?</content>
        <published>2007-09-14T00:50:55.932+02:00</published>
        <updated>2007-09-14T00:50:55.932+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=alicam&amp;conv=882093&amp;comment_id=17153854</id>
        <title>Sully, I suppose it may not ha</title>
        <author>
            <name>Alister Cameron</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=alicam&amp;conv=882093&amp;comment_id=17153854"/>
        <content>Sully, I suppose it may not have been strategic... it depends. But it's at least possible that the Wikipedia guys thought ahead to the time when people would link in this way...

Of course if they ever tun ads on there they'll get in trouble with Google, as (I assume) did answers.com, who are not at all in the SERPs like they used to be...

-Alister</content>
        <published>2007-07-14T07:01:15.630+02:00</published>
        <updated>2007-07-14T07:01:15.630+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=alicam&amp;conv=871415&amp;comment_id=16931470</id>
        <title>@Joe - Yes. They're absolutely</title>
        <author>
            <name>Alister Cameron</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=alicam&amp;conv=871415&amp;comment_id=16931470"/>
        <content>@Joe - Yes. They're absolutely 100% standard Wordpress posts. Nothing to change about them at all, except to add them to a specific category, against which you apply the different styling. In my case a category called "asides", which is fairly logical :)

And yes, the CSS makes a bunch of what would normally appear in the blog posts invisible... it also pulls the paragraph spacing out, it changes the colours of links, adds the left-hand border, etc.

@Aaron - I am banking on the fact that the SEs have seen enough display:none styling tricks that are not about cloaking, to realise that a blanket ban is impossible to apply. I know for a fact they don't do that..</content>
        <published>2007-07-10T02:06:57.272+02:00</published>
        <updated>2007-07-10T02:06:57.272+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=alicam&amp;conv=620213&amp;comment_id=11957342</id>
        <title>@Joe - I've updated my post wi</title>
        <author>
            <name>Alister Cameron</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=alicam&amp;conv=620213&amp;comment_id=11957342"/>
        <content>@Joe - I've updated my post with a clearer explanation of my change. I hope that's all clear for you now :)</content>
        <published>2007-04-12T04:28:50.865+02:00</published>
        <updated>2007-04-12T04:28:50.865+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=alicam&amp;conv=549498&amp;comment_id=11546374</id>
        <title>To Scott, one of the above com</title>
        <author>
            <name>Alister Cameron // Blogologist</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=alicam&amp;conv=549498&amp;comment_id=11546374"/>
        <content>To Scott, one of the above commenters:

I think you've done a great job getting a pro to design your site, but there's one minor issue to be resolved: the image of you on the right is a huge file that weighs in at well over 200Kb! It must be resampled and resized... for the love of your visitors who are not on broadband, etc.

:)</content>
        <published>2007-04-04T14:12:08.718+02:00</published>
        <updated>2007-04-04T14:12:08.718+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
</feed>
