<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <id>http://www.cocomment.com/comments/aditya</id>
    <title>coComments related to aditya</title>
    <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/comments/aditya"/>
    <rights>Copyright 2007 coComment.com</rights>
    <updated>2009-11-25T12:02:33.522+01:00</updated>
    <icon>http://www.cocomment.com/images/logo4rss.gif</icon>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=aditya&amp;conv=374030&amp;comment_id=5305106</id>
        <title>The status is up and running f</title>
        <author>
            <name>Aditya</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=aditya&amp;conv=374030&amp;comment_id=5305106"/>
        <content>The status is up and running fine! And I agree with the comments here. It is not news when just one source is constantly re-iterated over and over again. We have been seeing nothing but how Google has been goofing up over here, which by the list of Google articles listed in this post, you cannot deny.

I am not a Google fanboy by any means, but I even I can figure out when something is being targeted unfairly. Google has been plugging holes at the same rate (if not faster) that they're coming up. There aren't that many to plug to begin with.

Please, move on off of Google. Let's go back to the Internet!</content>
        <published>2007-01-03T03:29:17.741+01:00</published>
        <updated>2007-01-03T03:29:17.741+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
</feed>
