<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <id>http://www.cocomment.com/comments/SteveNimmons</id>
    <title>coComments related to SteveNimmons</title>
    <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/comments/SteveNimmons"/>
    <rights>Copyright 2007 coComment.com</rights>
    <updated>2009-11-22T00:28:40.086+01:00</updated>
    <icon>http://www.cocomment.com/images/logo4rss.gif</icon>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=SteveNimmons&amp;conv=2377020&amp;comment_id=55512648</id>
        <title>I enjoyed Michael's article an</title>
        <author>
            <name>Steve Nimmons</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=SteveNimmons&amp;conv=2377020&amp;comment_id=55512648"/>
        <content>I enjoyed Michael's article and ideas - thanks for sharing. I think there is scope for expansion, and there are some really interesting philosophical questions around the definition of presence. Web2 seems to fragment as well as unite and the ability to over-arch presence across Web2 'silos' is really quite interesting. I also hereby claim the term 'gravitas engineering' :-)</content>
        <published>2009-02-04T17:22:51.059+01:00</published>
        <updated>2009-02-04T17:22:51.059+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=SteveNimmons&amp;conv=2377005&amp;comment_id=55510857</id>
        <title>I've tried LinkedIn and Xing a</title>
        <author>
            <name>Steve Nimmons</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=SteveNimmons&amp;conv=2377005&amp;comment_id=55510857"/>
        <content>I've tried LinkedIn and Xing and eventually gave up on Xing. I found LinkedIn much more relevant and had much better groups. Cant someone create an 'overarching' framework / service so we can internetwork between all of these social hubs? Please!!!?</content>
        <published>2009-02-04T17:10:30.622+01:00</published>
        <updated>2009-02-04T17:10:30.622+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=SteveNimmons&amp;conv=2376995&amp;comment_id=55509498</id>
        <title>I think Hoffman is absolutely </title>
        <author>
            <name>Steve Nimmons</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=SteveNimmons&amp;conv=2376995&amp;comment_id=55509498"/>
        <content>I think Hoffman is absolutely correct in what he says about merging with Facebook. It may at some point make commercial sense (who knows) but the separation of business and personal networks is really appealing (to some, I think most). It seems to have happened that way quite organically, so why force it together. I just hope LinkedIn doesn't lose the plot with application additions. Keep it simple and reasonably vanilla please.</content>
        <published>2009-02-04T17:06:24.841+01:00</published>
        <updated>2009-02-04T17:06:24.841+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=SteveNimmons&amp;conv=2376976&amp;comment_id=55507028</id>
        <title>I like the description 'presen</title>
        <author>
            <name>Steve Nimmons</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=SteveNimmons&amp;conv=2376976&amp;comment_id=55507028"/>
        <content>I like the description 'presence engineers'. Web2 has really fragmented what presence is all about - it's hard to find a truly captive audience these days as there is so much content and so many delivery channels. I kind of also like the idea of 'gravitas engineers', but that's another story :-)</content>
        <published>2009-02-04T16:50:46.190+01:00</published>
        <updated>2009-02-04T16:50:46.190+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=SteveNimmons&amp;conv=2376864&amp;comment_id=55491756</id>
        <title>It would be interesting to see</title>
        <author>
            <name>Steve Nimmons</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=SteveNimmons&amp;conv=2376864&amp;comment_id=55491756"/>
        <content>It would be interesting to see what synergy could be created with things like Facebook causes. I wonder if maybe there's some API magic that could glue established communities on other Social Networks to Kiva's financing model. Rather than just have bunches of non-active cause members on Social Networks it would be interesting to see if they could be 'mobilised' through such integration...</content>
        <published>2009-02-04T14:44:07.686+01:00</published>
        <updated>2009-02-04T14:44:07.686+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=SteveNimmons&amp;conv=2376852&amp;comment_id=55490783</id>
        <title>Tom, see the section above whi</title>
        <author>
            <name>Steve Nimmons</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=SteveNimmons&amp;conv=2376852&amp;comment_id=55490783"/>
        <content>Tom, see the section above which has a link i.e.:

"We have 500 invites for TechCrunch readers here."

There are still a couple of hundred left as far as I could see...</content>
        <published>2009-02-04T14:37:06.761+01:00</published>
        <updated>2009-02-04T14:37:06.761+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=SteveNimmons&amp;conv=2376852&amp;comment_id=55489683</id>
        <title>Just signed up and had a very </title>
        <author>
            <name>Steve Nimmons</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=SteveNimmons&amp;conv=2376852&amp;comment_id=55489683"/>
        <content>Just signed up and had a very quick look (I'll come back for more later!). Would be nice to have an 'import stuff about me' button from iLike / Last.FM and so on so it could build a profile / intelligent list of what I might be looking for. 

I don't like the Google Ads on the pages, just a personal taste thing - but better to monetise through ticket cross-selling in the end I would suspect.

Worth a look...</content>
        <published>2009-02-04T14:35:31.240+01:00</published>
        <updated>2009-02-04T14:35:31.240+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=SteveNimmons&amp;conv=2376838&amp;comment_id=55487254</id>
        <title>I think these emerging mobile </title>
        <author>
            <name>Steve Nimmons</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=SteveNimmons&amp;conv=2376838&amp;comment_id=55487254"/>
        <content>I think these emerging mobile apps are really interesting. On the privacy side of things, it's important to remember the phone is the tracked device, not the person - so you probably cant use Latitude locations as alibis - well not yet anyway!</content>
        <published>2009-02-04T14:26:56.342+01:00</published>
        <updated>2009-02-04T14:26:56.342+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=SteveNimmons&amp;conv=2376837&amp;comment_id=55487247</id>
        <title>Makes you wonder if, where and</title>
        <author>
            <name>Steve Nimmons</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=SteveNimmons&amp;conv=2376837&amp;comment_id=55487247"/>
        <content>Makes you wonder if, where and how they are storing and protecting subscriber payment details. Time for an audit perhaps...</content>
        <published>2009-02-04T14:24:51.628+01:00</published>
        <updated>2009-02-04T14:24:51.628+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=SteveNimmons&amp;conv=2375646&amp;comment_id=55293810</id>
        <title>It's a rather disturbing issue</title>
        <author>
            <name>Steve Nimmons</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=SteveNimmons&amp;conv=2375646&amp;comment_id=55293810"/>
        <content>It's a rather disturbing issue, and I think all of these sites need to be working on a solution across many geographic and jurisdictional boundaries. It would be interesting if this kind of 'problem' became an enabler and driver for better global co-operation / information sharing. Nothing can ever be made 100% safe though, hence the ever present need for education and parental vigilance.</content>
        <published>2009-02-03T19:29:56.995+01:00</published>
        <updated>2009-02-03T19:29:56.995+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=SteveNimmons&amp;conv=2375177&amp;comment_id=55225171</id>
        <title>This is a step in the right di</title>
        <author>
            <name>Steve Nimmons</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=SteveNimmons&amp;conv=2375177&amp;comment_id=55225171"/>
        <content>This is a step in the right direction and will hopefully frustrate the creators of those awful scraper sites. I wonder though at the universal applicability (given variation in copyright legislation across the globe), as well as people's genuine understanding of licensing models and attribution requirements. Let's retain pragmatism and an element of educating and not just vilifying the 'accidental infringer'.</content>
        <published>2009-02-03T12:49:52.405+01:00</published>
        <updated>2009-02-03T12:49:52.405+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=SteveNimmons&amp;conv=2375044&amp;comment_id=55208582</id>
        <title>Fascinating article. It would </title>
        <author>
            <name>Steve Nimmons</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=SteveNimmons&amp;conv=2375044&amp;comment_id=55208582"/>
        <content>Fascinating article. It would be nice to see a further drill-down into what (in terms of semantics and content type) people are more likely to re-tweet. I had previously noted (through personal use) that time windows were quite important. Being active when the primary users in the US are online, generated a lot more conversation. No big surprise, but worth noting if you are a PR company or a marketer in the UK!</content>
        <published>2009-02-03T11:03:42.565+01:00</published>
        <updated>2009-02-03T11:03:42.565+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=SteveNimmons&amp;conv=2321121&amp;comment_id=51544835</id>
        <title>I would also add that Friendfe</title>
        <author>
            <name>Steve Nimmons</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=SteveNimmons&amp;conv=2321121&amp;comment_id=51544835"/>
        <content>I would also add that Friendfeed's 'liked' function works great for fast social sharing. I've got this linked to Twitter, so with a single click on Friendfeed I can post up that I like the article at the link destination. It occurs to me this can circumvent Retweet, and hence add further complication to the solution to trending and authority tracking. 

For 'those what comment' I would recommend getting a gravatar and using the same pic across your web presences and 'comment streams' to have 'brand consistency'.</content>
        <published>2009-01-21T09:09:23.751+01:00</published>
        <updated>2009-01-21T09:09:23.751+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=SteveNimmons&amp;conv=2116718&amp;comment_id=43665462</id>
        <title>I'm not sure that 'writing las</title>
        <author>
            <name>Steve Nimmons</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=SteveNimmons&amp;conv=2116718&amp;comment_id=43665462"/>
        <content>I'm not sure that 'writing lasts forever' (as in point 10). Journalistic output has a rather short half-life in my view. Just to represent the counterpoint, blogging is sometimes more entertaining when it breaks all the rules and is wonderfully amateur.</content>
        <published>2008-12-19T11:46:36.949+01:00</published>
        <updated>2008-12-19T11:46:36.949+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=SteveNimmons&amp;conv=2092925&amp;comment_id=42500583</id>
        <title>It does look rather splendid. </title>
        <author>
            <name>Account </name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=SteveNimmons&amp;conv=2092925&amp;comment_id=42500583"/>
        <content>It does look rather splendid. Looking forward to see it 'in the flesh'...</content>
        <published>2008-12-14T15:25:24.466+01:00</published>
        <updated>2008-12-14T15:25:24.466+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=SteveNimmons&amp;conv=1434629&amp;comment_id=28991584</id>
        <title>Salutations fellow Retaggr's..</title>
        <author>
            <name>Steve Nimmons</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=SteveNimmons&amp;conv=1434629&amp;comment_id=28991584"/>
        <content>Salutations fellow Retaggr's...</content>
        <published>2008-07-27T18:12:48.185+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-07-27T18:12:48.185+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=SteveNimmons&amp;conv=1361080&amp;comment_id=28448292</id>
        <title>No joy with that, let's try th</title>
        <author>
            <name>Steve Nimmons</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=SteveNimmons&amp;conv=1361080&amp;comment_id=28448292"/>
        <content>No joy with that, let's try the bookmarklet...</content>
        <published>2008-07-07T20:25:16.033+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-07-07T20:25:16.033+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
</feed>
