<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <id>http://www.cocomment.com/comments/steph</id>
    <title>coComments related to steph</title>
    <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/comments/steph"/>
    <rights>Copyright 2007 coComment.com</rights>
    <updated>2009-11-21T16:41:39.370+01:00</updated>
    <icon>http://www.cocomment.com/images/logo4rss.gif</icon>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=1777801&amp;comment_id=31205707</id>
        <title>What works for me:

- definite</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie Booth</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=1777801&amp;comment_id=31205707"/>
        <content>What works for me:

- definitely, definitely, taking time off
- reading stuff that makes me laugh (icanhascheeseburger top of the list)
- a chat with one of my freelance buddies
- physical exercise/singing
- cleaning the flat/office (no kidding -- it reduces my stress and unburns me)</content>
        <published>2008-09-17T23:15:33.230+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-09-17T23:15:33.230+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=1656803&amp;comment_id=31182198</id>
        <title>I find it really interesting h</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie Booth</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=1656803&amp;comment_id=31182198"/>
        <content>I find it really interesting how the appearance of new tools changes the way we express ourselves online. Over my eight years of blogging, I've clearly seen an evolution in what I write. 

Of course, we change as human beings, and that's to be taken into account too. But Twitter, Tumblr, Facebook and YouTube (even Flickr!) have all had their impact.

We tried to touch upon this subject &lt;a href="http://www.viddler.com/explore/steph/videos/42/"&gt;during a panel at BlogTalk&lt;/a&gt; last spring, but I'm not completely happy with it -- it stayed a bit superficial, in my opinion. If anybody has research on this phenomenon or ideas to share, I'd be interested in hearing them.

I guess the place to start is examining and analyzing what we blog for, and then seeing how some of these new post-blogging tools might be better at achieving some of these goals than good ol' blogging.</content>
        <published>2008-09-17T10:13:57.583+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-09-17T10:13:57.583+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=1773820&amp;comment_id=31161596</id>
        <title>My grandad (81!) had his car s</title>
        <author>
            <name>Anonymous</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=1773820&amp;comment_id=31161596"/>
        <content>My grandad (81!) had his car searched as he was waiting for me in Leeds railway station parking while I was picking up a friend. He stayed in the car to catch a short snooze while he waited.

The officer opened the boot of the car, had a quick look around, and only after my grandad suggested he might also want to look beneath the boot floor cover, did he do so.

As my grandad reported to me, "searching for bombs".

My personal suspicion is that somebody somewhere has search quotas to meet. Says my grandad, "about 8 policemen came out of the station, and one of them made a beeline for me" -- another car (with owner) was searched in the same parking lot. 

Probably, my grandad dozing in his car made for a good, danger-and-surprise-free search.</content>
        <published>2008-09-16T19:36:04.253+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-09-16T19:36:04.253+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=1621032&amp;comment_id=30586912</id>
        <title>Amaury, c'est pas comme ça que</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie Booth</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=1621032&amp;comment_id=30586912"/>
        <content>Amaury, c'est pas comme ça que je comprends "hook" en anglais (avec ma maigre expérience de fabricante de plugins). Le "hook", c'est "l'endroit" où vient s'accrocher le plugin. D'accord que techniquement c'est une fonction exécutée lors d'un événement, mais la métaphore utilisée par WordPress avec le mot "hook", à mon avis, marche tout à fait aussi en français avec le mot "crochet". Qu'est-ce qui ne va pas avec crochet? Le crochet, c'est une fonction dans le code de wordpress, et auquel on va "accrocher" son plugin (en ordonnant l'exécution d'une fonction lors d'un événement donnné).

Pourquoi changer la métaphore? Je ne vois pas l'intérêt.

On pourrait à ce moment-là tout aussi bien partir sur des histoires de greffe, hein, si on veut abandonner la métaphore d'origine du crochet/hook.</content>
        <published>2008-08-23T22:02:09.383+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-08-23T22:02:09.383+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=1621032&amp;comment_id=30585552</id>
        <title>Je vote pour "crochet", qui "s</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie Booth</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=1621032&amp;comment_id=30585552"/>
        <content>Je vote pour "crochet", qui "sonne" à mes oreilles bilingues exactement comme "hook" (ni plus ni moins de Peter Pan), et que je trouve très parlant. Un crochet, c'est un endroit où l'on accroche quelque chose (une fonction, une action, un filtre).</content>
        <published>2008-08-23T19:49:17.837+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-08-23T19:49:17.837+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=1588228&amp;comment_id=30283748</id>
        <title>Très joli mais... bon sang, qu</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie Booth</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=1588228&amp;comment_id=30283748"/>
        <content>Très joli mais... bon sang, qu'est-ce que c'est que cette nouvelle mode de vouloir noyer le blog absolument? 

Je m'explique. A la base, le blog, c'est une grosse pile d'articles les uns derrière les autres, dans leur intégralité (oui oui), et sur une page. L'avantage: quand on débarque, on commence à lire en haut, on continue, on continue, on continue... et avant de se rendre compte de ce qui nous est arrivé, on a lu 6 articles. 

Bien sûr, faut pas faire des pages hénaurmes non plus, donc on limite le nombre d'articles sur le page d'accueil. Une dizaine, allez.

Alors bon. Il existe bien, ce blog: http://www.wordpress-fr.net/blog

Mais depuis http://www.wordpress-fr.net/, les amis, on y arrive comment? Pas un seul lien. Ou alors je suis bicle.

Mais sinon, hein, c'est très joli. J'aime.</content>
        <published>2008-08-13T20:29:47.741+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-08-13T20:29:47.741+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=1575891&amp;comment_id=30180830</id>
        <title>Haha! tu m'as bien fait rire :</title>
        <author>
            <name>Anonymous</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=1575891&amp;comment_id=30180830"/>
        <content>Haha! tu m'as bien fait rire :-)

Sur Mac c'est facile: alt+4 (ç c'est maj+4). T'as essayé Altgr+4, à tout hasard?</content>
        <published>2008-08-10T13:24:26.445+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-08-10T13:24:26.445+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=1570891&amp;comment_id=30146053</id>
        <title>"Avoid mixing languages on eac</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie Booth</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=1570891&amp;comment_id=30146053"/>
        <content>"Avoid mixing languages on each page, as this may confuse Googlebot as well as your users." (Nico, thanks, I'd missed that one)

I'm really disappointed to see this kind of advice handed out. Yes, it confuses Googlebot, but only because it doesn't (I guess?) take into account lang="xx" attributes. (Yeah, nobody uses them, but that's because nobody parses them.)

But users? &lt;a href="http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2007/08/11/most-people-are-multilingual/"&gt;Most people are not pure monolinguals.&lt;/a&gt; We need ways to make linguistic barriers online weaker, and not stronger.

I've been mixing languages on &lt;a href="http://climbtothestars.org/"&gt;Climb to the Stars&lt;/a&gt; for eight years now, and it hasn't prevented my readers or my Page Rank from being happy.

I vote for Google learning that the "page" is not the smallest item on the web that is allowed to have its own language attribute, rather than asking people to conform to some kind of artificial monolingualism.</content>
        <published>2008-08-09T01:08:15.600+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-08-09T01:08:15.600+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=1570891&amp;comment_id=30131716</id>
        <title>I have two multilingual sites,</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie Booth</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=1570891&amp;comment_id=30131716"/>
        <content>I have two multilingual sites, one being &lt;a href="http://stephanie-booth.com/"&gt;my professional site&lt;/a&gt; (you should be redirected either to EN or FR depending on your language prefs), and the other being my blog &lt;a href="http://climbtothestars.org/"&gt;Climb to the Stars&lt;/a&gt;, where I blog both in French and in English.

I actually &lt;a href="http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2007/07/10/talk-languages-on-the-internet-at-google-tomorrow/"&gt;gave a talk at Google last year about multilingualism online&lt;/a&gt; (you can &lt;a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5004419583730327409"&gt;watch the video online&lt;/a&gt;) and one of the points I insisted upon is to PLEASE not confuse country and language. Living in a multilingual country (Switzerland), I am constantly exposed to all the bad that comes with that confusion.

Online, political borders are important when laws come in (if you're selling stuff, for example). Otherwise, most of the time, the only borders we have are linguistic.

Buying a "x-country" domain for your "x-language" site kind of assumes that 1 country = 1 language. 

Anyway... some food for thought. If you want more pointers, I've gathered some on my &lt;a href="http://climbtothestars.org/focus/multilingual/"&gt;multilingual page&lt;/a&gt;. Comments welcome.</content>
        <published>2008-08-08T18:25:09.138+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-08-08T18:25:09.138+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=182809&amp;comment_id=30131273</id>
        <title>Anonymous: I can assure you it</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie Booth</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=182809&amp;comment_id=30131273"/>
        <content>Anonymous: I can assure you it was a bug. It wasn't a "design" so that somebody could eavesdrop. You've probably watched too much X-Files or conspiracy theory thingies ;-)</content>
        <published>2008-08-08T18:11:27.917+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-08-08T18:11:27.917+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=1403438&amp;comment_id=26791717</id>
        <title>Donna: if you sent in your pos</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie Booth</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=1403438&amp;comment_id=26791717"/>
        <content>Donna: if you sent in your post before the event, then it makes complete sense. But you'll have to agree that it feels a bit weird to read a post saying "come to the event" published two days after it took place. I'd add a note or something to make that clear.

And yes, I've looked at the site -- I've written it myself, as I organised Going Solo.

Thanks for your enthusiasm about the conference, and for writing about it. I'm sorry I reacted badly, but the date issue really made your post look like you hadn't even taken the trouble to look up the conference date. You should get the people at b5media to add a line of explanation for you.</content>
        <published>2008-05-23T19:39:42.970+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-05-23T19:39:42.970+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=1223331&amp;comment_id=23747338</id>
        <title>I noticed that photographing t</title>
        <author>
            <name>Steph</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=1223331&amp;comment_id=23747338"/>
        <content>I noticed that photographing the person talking definitely does not make for the best shots. People pull weird faces when they talk. And they're not still (if you're doing it no-flash).

People listening are usually a much better source of portraits, in my opinion.</content>
        <published>2008-02-02T12:32:06.347+01:00</published>
        <updated>2008-02-02T12:32:06.347+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=1161748&amp;comment_id=22773005</id>
        <title>I find that the biggest drawba</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie Booth</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=1161748&amp;comment_id=22773005"/>
        <content>I find that the biggest drawback about video/audio online for me is that I have to stop everything and give my undivided attention.

Now, I don't want to make it sound like giving my undivided attention to something is a problem. I do it on a regular basis.

But when I'm online in the text-world, I float in a state of multi-tasking that I appreciate. I can be writing or reading a blog post and easily interrupt it for a quick chat, or even, as I've done sometimes, write and chat in parallel. Or read and write. Or wander off and do something else, and come back to it later.

None of that with audio and video. Once you start watching/listening, you're stuck there, and you have to stop it if you want to wander off. 

It is a different mode from my normal online mode.</content>
        <published>2007-12-28T07:34:07.714+01:00</published>
        <updated>2007-12-28T07:34:07.714+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=1031286&amp;comment_id=20792277</id>
        <title>I'm not certain a "video-based</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie Booth</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=1031286&amp;comment_id=20792277"/>
        <content>I'm not certain a "video-based Twitter" is a viable concept: the huge difference between video and text is that the latter is scannable, and that's precisely what allows the presence/flow dimension in Twitter. You can "keep an eye" on a stream of text, but can you "keep an eye" on a stream of videos? Also, it takes much less time to keep up with a stream of text than with a stream of videos.</content>
        <published>2007-10-17T08:19:39.088+02:00</published>
        <updated>2007-10-17T08:19:39.088+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=1035304&amp;comment_id=20269428</id>
        <title>Je n'aime pas du tout ces outi</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie Booth</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=1035304&amp;comment_id=20269428"/>
        <content>Je n'aime pas du tout ces outils branchés "popularité". Ça encourage les "feedback loops", ce que je trouve dommage: on va voir quelque chose parce que c'est populaire, plutôt que parce que c'est intéressant. En plus, ça met les gens en compétition, parfois déplaisante. La course à la première page de digg.</content>
        <published>2007-10-11T12:28:42.689+02:00</published>
        <updated>2007-10-11T12:28:42.689+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=999748&amp;comment_id=18840907</id>
        <title>Raphaël: comme je l'ai expliqu</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=999748&amp;comment_id=18840907"/>
        <content>Raphaël: comme je l'ai expliqué à Reboot, dans le cas de Twitter, le fait que l'interface ne soit pas localisée n'est peut-être pas aussi grave que pour d'autres services. C'est clair que ce serait mieux si elle l'était.

Pour ce qui est de Frazr, j'avoue que je n'y pensais plus du tout. Il faut dire que je ne m'y suis pas intéressée de très près, probablement parce que le côté "oh, ils font un truc cool en anglais, clonons ça dans d'autres langue" m'agace un peu (mais je me suis pas renseignée très loin... si ça se trouve ils ont désespérément essayé de contacter les gens de Twitter pour leur proposer une collaboration avant de se lancer dans la concurrence -- quoique bon, les gars de Twitter n'en avait jamais entendu parler quand je le leur ai signalé).

Donc oui, si vous voulez votre interface en français ou allemand, allez voir http://frazr.com/. Par contre pour les instructions, faudra chercher ailleurs: je n'y suis pas!</content>
        <published>2007-09-13T16:58:36.858+02:00</published>
        <updated>2007-09-13T16:58:36.858+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=737756&amp;comment_id=14387590</id>
        <title>(oui, j'apprendrai un jour à c</title>
        <author>
            <name>(anonymous)</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=737756&amp;comment_id=14387590"/>
        <content>(oui, j'apprendrai un jour à centraliser mes commentaires)

ZeLab: quand tu dis "sans intérêt" tu te places du point de vue de l'observateur extérieur, qui n'a pas de lien affectif avec la personne qui envoie des messages. 

On a fait cette critique à une certaine forme de blog-journal il y a des années déjà -- et on a compris depuis que le blog super-chiant-pour-le-monde-entier peut être fascinant pour 15 personnes -- et c'est ça qui fait sa valeur inestimable. 

Toi qui ne me connais pas, tu n'en as rien à faire (pour être polie) du fait que je cherche mon chat ou que j'ai oublié de changer de fuseau horaire en rentrant de Londres. Ce sont des petits détails anodins de ma vie. 

Mais les gens qui me sont proches (affectivement, je dis bien, pas forcément géographiquement) trouvent dans ces petits messages du quotidien quelque chose qui les rapproche de moi -- et qui me rapproche d'eux, car je sais que "they care".

Ouriel: pas vraiment d'accord avec ton point 1/ -- je crois que chacun a son moyen "préféré" d'intéragir avec Twitter. Personnellement, je préfère le web ou Twitterrific à l'IM-- trop intrusif. 

Je ne vois pas non plus de raisons de ne pas archiver les messages. C'est vrai que c'est une archive qui a relativement peu d'intérêt -- mais des fois, comme les logs IRC ou IM, on va fouiller dedans et ça rend service.

Par contre, parfaitement d'accord quand tu dis que c'est entre l'IM et IRC.</content>
        <published>2007-05-22T20:38:42.047+02:00</published>
        <updated>2007-05-22T20:38:42.047+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=737756&amp;comment_id=14387085</id>
        <title>Jérôme: je connais beaucoup de</title>
        <author>
            <name>(anonymous)</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=737756&amp;comment_id=14387085"/>
        <content>Jérôme: je connais beaucoup de gens qui utilisent intensément les "status" IM pour communiquer ce genre d'information à leur buddy list. Sur IRC, aussi, on voit fréquemment des changements de pseudo pour indiquer l'activité de la personne.

Pour ce qui est de l'intégration Twitter/IM, c'est déjà là: sur OSX, il y a moyen de mettre à jour son status sur Adium via Twitterrific.

Je serais curieuse de voir s'il y a une corrélation entre l'utilisation du chat (IRC ou autre) ou bien de l'IM et l'attitude générale face à Twitter ("capte pas" ou "c'est génial"). Il faudrait probablement décortiquer un peu l'usage chat/IM des gens sondés pour avoir quelque chose d'intéressent (en particulier l'utilisation ou non des fameux "status").</content>
        <published>2007-05-22T20:28:50.231+02:00</published>
        <updated>2007-05-22T20:28:50.231+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=737756&amp;comment_id=14368647</id>
        <title>Twitter, c'est un outil de lia</title>
        <author>
            <name>(anonymous)</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=737756&amp;comment_id=14368647"/>
        <content>Twitter, c'est un outil de liant social. Si on cherche "à quoi ça sert" on est déjà sur la fausse piste.

J'ai repris quelques-unes des critiques les plus communes ("c'est sans intérêt", "le monde s'en fout") dans mon dernier billet sur Twitter: http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2007/05/14/pas-capte-twitter/

Pour comprendre Twitter, il faut regarder les relations entre les gens, et non pas le contenu des messages. Ce n'est pas un outil de publication, mais un outil de présence.</content>
        <published>2007-05-22T16:00:56.606+02:00</published>
        <updated>2007-05-22T16:00:56.606+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=727908&amp;comment_id=14231878</id>
        <title>For a reason I haven't yet qui</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=727908&amp;comment_id=14231878"/>
        <content>For a reason I haven't yet quite clearly figured out, I much MUCH prefer Twitter to Jaiku. This isn't about just trying to find a solution for myself (and honestly, "move there with your friends" -- I doubt I'd have that kind of leverage, because then they'd have to move with *their* friends to be happy, etc -- not a solution).

This is about a service I love, and wanting it to be better.</content>
        <published>2007-05-19T14:36:10.549+02:00</published>
        <updated>2007-05-19T14:36:10.549+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=649535&amp;comment_id=12668938</id>
        <title>That looks like a guitar rathe</title>
        <author>
            <name>(anonymous)</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=649535&amp;comment_id=12668938"/>
        <content>That looks like a guitar rather than coffee...</content>
        <published>2007-04-23T20:13:46.714+02:00</published>
        <updated>2007-04-23T20:13:46.714+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=619451&amp;comment_id=12077498</id>
        <title>Euh... moi, pour aller à San F</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=619451&amp;comment_id=12077498"/>
        <content>Euh... moi, pour aller à San Francisco?</content>
        <published>2007-04-14T00:35:16.938+02:00</published>
        <updated>2007-04-14T00:35:16.938+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=597755&amp;comment_id=11424959</id>
        <title>Ah well, Crossover needs my OS</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=597755&amp;comment_id=11424959"/>
        <content>Ah well, Crossover needs my OSX install disk, and I don't have it with me here. This will have to wait until I get back home!</content>
        <published>2007-04-02T11:28:34.522+02:00</published>
        <updated>2007-04-02T11:28:34.522+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=597755&amp;comment_id=11424888</id>
        <title>I'll give it a shot, but hones</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=597755&amp;comment_id=11424888"/>
        <content>I'll give it a shot, but honestly I don't have very high hopes. It's not on the supported list, and speech recognition stuff is... well, delicate. (Dragon was, like, the one application which didn't work on VirtualPC, and needed workarounds to work in the first version of Parallels.)</content>
        <published>2007-04-02T11:27:01.971+02:00</published>
        <updated>2007-04-02T11:27:01.971+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=553826&amp;comment_id=11295740</id>
        <title>Alors c'est un peu ça le probl</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=553826&amp;comment_id=11295740"/>
        <content>Alors c'est un peu ça le problème, ça leur coûte pas mal cher!</content>
        <published>2007-03-30T23:39:18.740+02:00</published>
        <updated>2007-03-30T23:39:18.740+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=581898&amp;comment_id=11060773</id>
        <title>I see my concern changing as t</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=581898&amp;comment_id=11060773"/>
        <content>I see my concern changing as the blogwave catches on. Now more and more people are reporting distorted versions of the story (by oversimplifying), and calling facts things which are hypotheses.

I hope there is not a backlash created by the mob effect which will make more victimes than there already were in this story.</content>
        <published>2007-03-27T02:40:07.869+02:00</published>
        <updated>2007-03-27T02:40:07.869+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=553826&amp;comment_id=10794854</id>
        <title>Je te rassure, Stéphane, ces i</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=553826&amp;comment_id=10794854"/>
        <content>Je te rassure, Stéphane, ces idées-là on est beaucoup à les avoir et à attendre leur implémentation! Je suis tout à fait d'accord que sans les "groupes" Twitter n'est pas viable sous sa forme SMS.

J'en ai parlé avec les concepteurs de Twitter quand j'étais à San Francisco, et encore depuis (et d'autres personnes aussi), et c'est quelque chose qu'ils sont en train de développer. Ils veulent par contre pas faire ça à la va-vite, car c'est important de le faire "juste" du premier coup.</content>
        <published>2007-03-22T00:19:58.330+01:00</published>
        <updated>2007-03-22T00:19:58.330+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=553826&amp;comment_id=10703079</id>
        <title>Si t'as un vrai rendez-vous et</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=553826&amp;comment_id=10703079"/>
        <content>Si t'as un vrai rendez-vous et que tu veux pas être dérangé, soit tu mets ton téléphone sur silence, soit tu envoies "off" à twitter pour qu'il te laisse tranquille.

si tu renonces à contrôler le service, pas étonnant que tu t'en sentes l'esclave.</content>
        <published>2007-03-20T10:07:09.060+01:00</published>
        <updated>2007-03-20T10:07:09.060+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=560500&amp;comment_id=10663714</id>
        <title>Thanks, Ric. What do you mean </title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=560500&amp;comment_id=10663714"/>
        <content>Thanks, Ric. What do you mean exactly by "open up access"? Let others write in it?</content>
        <published>2007-03-19T13:39:33.536+01:00</published>
        <updated>2007-03-19T13:39:33.536+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=560500&amp;comment_id=10634797</id>
        <title>Wow! Thanks for all the feedba</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=560500&amp;comment_id=10634797"/>
        <content>Wow! Thanks for all the feedback (in comments, e-mails, and IM windows). I'm glad to see this topic strikes a chord with so many of you! I'll definitely sleep/work on it and submit it to the rebooterati.</content>
        <published>2007-03-18T22:43:52.321+01:00</published>
        <updated>2007-03-18T22:43:52.321+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=553826&amp;comment_id=10580755</id>
        <title>Je me rends compte qu'il manqu</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=553826&amp;comment_id=10580755"/>
        <content>Je me rends compte qu'il manque un petit bout à mon explication. En effet, on pourrait toujours penser que ce genre de contact (comme le chat, par exemple) pourrait venir "remplacer" ou "diminuer" les contacts plus riches comme les rencontres ou les appels téléphoniques.

Il n'en est rien, et même au contraire. Si vous chattez, vous faites probablement l'expérience que c'est un mode de communication qu'on pourrait dire à très faible énergie d'activation qui vient supplémenter les autres modes de communication ou de rencontre.

On ne chatte pas **au lieu de se voir**, on chatte **au lieu d'avoir zéro contact à ce moment-là**. Idem avec Twitter.

Cela vient rajouter un tout petit peu de liant là où (pour des questions de géographie, d'emploi du temps, ou de nature/stade de la relation) il n'y aurait rien du tout.

Dans ce sens, Twitter (comme le chat) permet de resserrer les liens ou de les aider à ne pas se distendre.</content>
        <published>2007-03-17T17:42:59.952+01:00</published>
        <updated>2007-03-17T17:42:59.952+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=553826&amp;comment_id=10501504</id>
        <title>Ben, visiblement, quelqu'un (e</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=553826&amp;comment_id=10501504"/>
        <content>Ben, visiblement, quelqu'un (et ses commentateurs) qui n'a pas "capté" :-)

Le seul "argument" que je vois dans son article (mis à part dire que "c'est naze", ce qui n'est pas un argument) c'est que le contenu ne "vole pas haut". Ce que j'essaie d'expliquer, c'est que même si ça ne "vole pas haut", ce sont peut-être des parcelles de vie qui ont un sens pour mes proches.

C'est sur internet, en public (en général) parce que c'est le moyen le plus facile de le diffuser (push, pull, tout ça).

Lire cet [excellentissime article de Tara Hunt sur Twitter](http://www.horsepigcow.com/2007/03/15/twits-twittering-for-the-sake-of-tweets-or-thats-not-why-i-twitter/) (c'est en anglais). Elle exprime parfaitement ce que je ressens.</content>
        <published>2007-03-16T11:58:34.946+01:00</published>
        <updated>2007-03-16T11:58:34.946+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=529290&amp;comment_id=9839963</id>
        <title>Congratulations! Not sure why,</title>
        <author>
            <name>Steph</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=529290&amp;comment_id=9839963"/>
        <content>Congratulations! Not sure why, but when you mentioned you had an announcement, I could kind of feel this one coming ;-)</content>
        <published>2007-03-07T00:36:03.365+01:00</published>
        <updated>2007-03-07T00:36:03.365+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=517125&amp;comment_id=9518354</id>
        <title>Nice! Congratulations! :-)</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie Booth</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=517125&amp;comment_id=9518354"/>
        <content>Nice! Congratulations! :-)</content>
        <published>2007-03-02T00:39:38.427+01:00</published>
        <updated>2007-03-02T00:39:38.427+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=505938&amp;comment_id=9281510</id>
        <title>Tu voyais pas celui de Michele</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=505938&amp;comment_id=9281510"/>
        <content>Tu voyais pas celui de Michele?</content>
        <published>2007-02-26T08:01:44.436+01:00</published>
        <updated>2007-02-26T08:01:44.436+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=469889&amp;comment_id=8503361</id>
        <title>From the horse's mouth (the ho</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie Booth</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=469889&amp;comment_id=8503361"/>
        <content>From the horse's mouth (the horse, here, being the transcript of the LIFT'07 video when Florence was speaking with Laurent):

http://www.ballpark.ch/blog/index.php?id=790

(bottom line: chinese whispers)</content>
        <published>2007-02-11T15:28:05.925+01:00</published>
        <updated>2007-02-11T15:28:05.925+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=455266&amp;comment_id=8219412</id>
        <title>This is really great news! Fir</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie Booth</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=455266&amp;comment_id=8219412"/>
        <content>This is really great news! First of all, I'm happy for you that you got something like your "dream job" -- but I'm also really glad for the ISN team that I met earlier this year. I think having somebody in the role of a social media evangelist/expert inside the team is a really really good thing.

ISN is definitely on the right track, and as you say, Bill does indeed "get it". I'm really looking forward to seeing where this will go.</content>
        <published>2007-02-05T22:25:23.056+01:00</published>
        <updated>2007-02-05T22:25:23.056+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=416292&amp;comment_id=6812653</id>
        <title>hi John, I've been quite inter</title>
        <author>
            <name>undefined</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=416292&amp;comment_id=6812653"/>
        <content>hi John, I've been quite interested in SL for some time now, though I haven't really been able to devote enough time to it.

I'm no economist, but a friend of mine brought it to my attention that there is a flaw in the "SL-economy": there is value in $$ inside the world, but Linden Labs wouldn't have the funds to let everybody cash out. 

Money is generated very easily and at no cost -- there is nothing that takes money out of the users' hands and back into the game.

Not quite sure I'm explaining this well, but it did make sense to me when I was told it.</content>
        <published>2007-01-20T02:29:39.355+01:00</published>
        <updated>2007-01-20T02:29:39.355+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=370143&amp;comment_id=5213827</id>
        <title>Bonne année :-)</title>
        <author>
            <name>(nobody)</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=370143&amp;comment_id=5213827"/>
        <content>Bonne année :-)</content>
        <published>2007-01-01T09:16:41.055+01:00</published>
        <updated>2007-01-01T09:16:41.055+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=357398&amp;comment_id=5026470</id>
        <title>Sans oublier Laura Roslin de B</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie Booth</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=357398&amp;comment_id=5026470"/>
        <content>Sans oublier Laura Roslin de Battlestar Galactica :-)</content>
        <published>2006-12-28T00:47:08.211+01:00</published>
        <updated>2006-12-28T00:47:08.211+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=357228&amp;comment_id=5005670</id>
        <title>Wow. Je viens d'appeler Easyje</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=357228&amp;comment_id=5005670"/>
        <content>Wow. Je viens d'appeler Easyjet et de me faire agresser pendant 10 minutes par l'agent au téléphone. (C'est pas de leur faute s'il y avait du brouillard, ils pouvaient pas prévoir, je vais pas me faire rembourser, le problème avec le site web c'est ma faute... Rah!)</content>
        <published>2006-12-27T13:00:49.910+01:00</published>
        <updated>2006-12-27T13:00:49.910+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=357228&amp;comment_id=4926273</id>
        <title>Pas de souci, je suis [bien re</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=357228&amp;comment_id=4926273"/>
        <content>Pas de souci, je suis [bien rentrée](http://twitter.com/stephtara/statuses/1614203), l'avion n'avait qu'une bonne heure de retard. Par contre, plus de bus, donc 50.- CHF de taxis que je vais tâcher de me faire rembourser par Easyjet après Noël.</content>
        <published>2006-12-25T01:05:37.975+01:00</published>
        <updated>2006-12-25T01:05:37.975+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=325182&amp;comment_id=4383409</id>
        <title>Haha! J'adore:

"c'est quoi un</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie Booth</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=325182&amp;comment_id=4383409"/>
        <content>Haha! J'adore:

"c'est quoi un virus?"

:-)</content>
        <published>2006-12-09T16:34:02.629+01:00</published>
        <updated>2006-12-09T16:34:02.629+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=325146&amp;comment_id=4382731</id>
        <title>Ne serait-ce pas là (je joue u</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie Booth</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=325146&amp;comment_id=4382731"/>
        <content>Ne serait-ce pas là (je joue un peu l'avocat du diable) un indice de bulle 2.0?</content>
        <published>2006-12-09T16:04:25.388+01:00</published>
        <updated>2006-12-09T16:04:25.388+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=297708&amp;comment_id=3803397</id>
        <title>Sinon, je peux tout à fait tec</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=297708&amp;comment_id=3803397"/>
        <content>Sinon, je peux tout à fait techniquement mettre les vidéos sur mon serveur. Je trouve juste sympa qu'elles soient dans un truc "social" à la Flickr/DailyMotion.</content>
        <published>2006-11-27T15:35:13.918+01:00</published>
        <updated>2006-11-27T15:35:13.918+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=297708&amp;comment_id=3803396</id>
        <title>C'est Akismet qui l'avait bouf</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=297708&amp;comment_id=3803396"/>
        <content>C'est Akismet qui l'avait bouffé. Merci de me l'avoir signalé, j'ai pu le ressuciter!</content>
        <published>2006-11-27T15:34:21.145+01:00</published>
        <updated>2006-11-27T15:34:21.145+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=86691&amp;comment_id=2072026</id>
        <title>As I just wrote &lt;a href="http:</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie Booth</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=86691&amp;comment_id=2072026"/>
        <content>As I just wrote &lt;a href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=32543128&amp;postID=115851979579183237"&gt;on Praveen's blog&lt;/a&gt;, the problem with Friendster is now fixed. New private messages are safe from being captured as comments and we have removed the "conversation".</content>
        <published>2006-09-18T18:33:43.530+02:00</published>
        <updated>2006-09-18T18:33:43.530+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=182809&amp;comment_id=2071965</id>
        <title>Praveen, thanks a lot for poin</title>
        <author>
            <name>tarastar</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=182809&amp;comment_id=2071965"/>
        <content>Praveen, thanks a lot for pointing this out! Actually, I found your post because I use Technorati to see what the blogosphere is saying about us.

We've removed the offending conversation thread and ensured that future private messages on Friendster would not be captured.

Thanks again!</content>
        <published>2006-09-18T18:22:33.044+02:00</published>
        <updated>2006-09-18T18:22:33.044+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=86691&amp;comment_id=1293657</id>
        <title>ventureblogalist: nice idea! I</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie Booth</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=86691&amp;comment_id=1293657"/>
        <content>ventureblogalist: nice idea! I'll add it to the idea box we have :-)</content>
        <published>2006-07-23T13:48:22.034+02:00</published>
        <updated>2006-07-23T13:48:22.034+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=86691&amp;comment_id=1271756</id>
        <title>Shrikant, you're mistaken. It'</title>
        <author>
            <name>Stephanie Booth</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?object=people&amp;context=explore&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=steph&amp;conv=86691&amp;comment_id=1271756"/>
        <content>Shrikant, you're mistaken. It's not necessary to be a coComment user to have your comments appear in the coComment conversations. What henri says is correct.

a) if the blog is coCo-friendly (ie, "integrated" -- see http://www.cocomment.com/tools/integrate) comments are directly sent to coComment, whether the person posting is a member or not

b) if the blog is not integrated, then you must wait for the crawler, but the comment does get collected, though a little later, maybe.

Totally aside from that, I saw you were from Pune -- do you know I lived there for a year? I didn't know about blogs back then, but kept a journal of my adventures: http://climbtothestars.org/logbook :-)</content>
        <published>2006-07-21T11:01:51.959+02:00</published>
        <updated>2006-07-21T11:01:51.959+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
</feed>
