<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <id>http://www.cocomment.com/blog/302230</id>
    <title>coComments related to FreeConservatives</title>
    <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/blog/302230"/>
    <rights>Copyright 2007 coComment.com</rights>
    <updated>2009-11-25T00:35:17.633+01:00</updated>
    <icon>http://www.cocomment.com/images/logo4rss.gif</icon>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1471492&amp;comment_id=139363673</id>
        <title>Quote:Originally Posted by Des</title>
        <author>
            <name>BuckeyeMike</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1471492&amp;comment_id=139363673"/>
        <content>Quote:Originally Posted by DesertFox&lt;a href="showthread.php?s=2f2b0ef56efa3a11bdd34bda83f8d148&amp;p=696074#post696074" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Stubble is the way to win a woman’s heart, a study has shown. Researchers found that women are more attracted to men with stubbly chins than those with clean-shaven faces or full beards.

Women participating in the research rated men with stubble as tough, mature, aggressive, dominant and masculine - and as the best romantic partners, either for a fling or a long-term relationships.

&lt;b&gt;The only drawback being "thigh rash"!!&lt;/b&gt;.......

The findings of the experiment, carried out on British women aged 18 to 44, could explain the appeal of actors such as George Clooney and Brad Pitt who cultivate their unshaven look.

The explanation for the preference is not clear, but experts in human evolution say that that facial hair may be a signal of aggression because it boosts the apparent size of the lower jaw, emphasising the teeth as weapons.

&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2008/06/29/scistubble129.xml" &gt;More&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;.</content>
        <published>2009-09-22T08:55:04.139+02:00</published>
        <updated>2009-09-22T08:55:04.139+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1471492&amp;comment_id=139363671</id>
        <title>Quote:Originally Posted by Des</title>
        <author>
            <name>Maggie_T</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1471492&amp;comment_id=139363671"/>
        <content>Quote:Originally Posted by DesertFox&lt;a href="showthread.php?s=2f2b0ef56efa3a11bdd34bda83f8d148&amp;p=696074#post696074" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Women participating in the research rated men with stubble as tough, mature, aggressive, dominant and masculine - and ...

Unkempt.

Quote:The findings of the experiment, carried out on British women aged 18 to 44, could explain the appeal of actors such as George Clooney and Brad Pitt who cultivate their unshaven look.

Clooney and Pitt?  I thought stubble was a sign of maturity.  

So.  The truth at last.  It's not the stubble &lt;i&gt;per se&lt;/i&gt; that these Limey cows like, but the stubble on Clooney's and Pitt's mugs, more likely.  Guessed as much.

Quote: The explanation for the preference is not clear

In the case of the polled Brit gals, see above. 

Quote:but experts in human evolution say that that facial hair may be a signal of aggression because it boosts the apparent size of the lower jaw, emphasising the teeth as weapons.

That's &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;it&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;?  These "experts" seem to have missed the real point, that point being that, in spite of feminazis, women still prefer their men to look (and be) manly, as opposed to some emasculated, "sensitive," puny, Woody Allen-type peacenik. 

Expected.</content>
        <published>2009-07-20T18:34:29.574+02:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-20T18:34:29.574+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1471492&amp;comment_id=139363670</id>
        <title>Quote:Originally Posted by Dec</title>
        <author>
            <name>Taylor1</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1471492&amp;comment_id=139363670"/>
        <content>Quote:Originally Posted by DeclinetoState&lt;a href="showthread.php?s=2f2b0ef56efa3a11bdd34bda83f8d148&amp;p=697614#post697614" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;I wouldn't want my gal to have a beard, either.

This one, does, however:


BARCROFT MEDIA

&lt;b&gt;Thomas Beatie pictured mowing the lawn at seven months pregnant&lt;/b&gt;</content>
        <published>2009-05-18T04:13:55.009+02:00</published>
        <updated>2009-05-18T04:13:55.009+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1471492&amp;comment_id=139363668</id>
        <title>Quote:Originally Posted by Suz</title>
        <author>
            <name>DeclinetoState</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1471492&amp;comment_id=139363668"/>
        <content>Quote:Originally Posted by Suzie&lt;a href="showthread.php?s=2f2b0ef56efa3a11bdd34bda83f8d148&amp;p=696393#post696393" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Mine isn't allowed to have a beard.I wouldn't want my gal to have a beard, either.

This one, does, however:


BARCROFT MEDIA

&lt;b&gt;Thomas Beatie pictured mowing the lawn at seven months pregnant&lt;/b&gt;</content>
        <published>2009-02-07T17:23:43.229+01:00</published>
        <updated>2009-02-07T17:23:43.229+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1471492&amp;comment_id=139363667</id>
        <title>Homey, the first time I heard </title>
        <author>
            <name>Timberwolf</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1471492&amp;comment_id=139363667"/>
        <content>Homey, the first time I heard him sing that song, I just about wrecked my Suburban, I was laughing so hard.

But, I had to scream, "YESSSSS!!!" and do a fist pump or two.  Best song written in YEARS!!

(and I don't even particularly care for country!!  LOL)</content>
        <published>2009-01-20T19:38:54.624+01:00</published>
        <updated>2009-01-20T19:38:54.624+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1471492&amp;comment_id=139363666</id>
        <title>Quote:Originally Posted by Hom</title>
        <author>
            <name>M.C.</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1471492&amp;comment_id=139363666"/>
        <content>Quote:Originally Posted by HomeschoolrsRUs&lt;a href="showthread.php?s=2f2b0ef56efa3a11bdd34bda83f8d148&amp;p=696613#post696613" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;i&gt;

These days there’s dudes gettin' facials
Manicured, waxed, and botoxed
But with deep spray on tans and creamy lotioney hands
You cain’t grip a tackle box
Yeah, with all of these men linin' up to get neutered
It’s hip now to be feminized
But, I don’t highlight my hair
I’ve still got a pair
Yeah, honey I’m still a guy

Oh, my eyebrows ain’t plucked
Theres a gun in my truck
Oh Thank God, I’m still a guy
Yeah boy&lt;/i&gt;Manliest verse in any song I've heard in a long while no doubt.</content>
        <published>2009-01-02T21:54:06.019+01:00</published>
        <updated>2009-01-02T21:54:06.019+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1471492&amp;comment_id=139363665</id>
        <title>Yes, I'll admit it.  I like st</title>
        <author>
            <name>HomeschoolrsRUs</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1471492&amp;comment_id=139363665"/>
        <content>Yes, I'll admit it.  I like stubble on a man, well, err, it looks good on MY man anyway.  I'm more partial to the blue-collar types (read "redneck").

Brad Paisley has a (relatively) new song dealing with the "metrosexual" issue:

&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;I'm Still A Guy&lt;/b&gt;

When you see a deer
You see Bambi
And I see antlers up on the wall
When you see a lake
You think picnics
And I see a large mouth up under that log
You’re probably thinkin' that you’re gonna change me
In some ways well, maybe you might
Scrub me down, dress me up
Oh, but no matter what
Remember, I’m still a guy

When you see a priceless French painting
I see a drunk naked girl
You think that ridin' a wild bull sounds crazy
And I’d like to give it a whirl
Well, love makes a man do some things he ain’t proud of
And in a weak moment I might
Walk your sissy dog
Hold your purse at the mall
But remember, I’m still a guy

And I’ll pour out my heart
Hold your hand in the car
Write a love song that makes you cry
Then turn right around
Knock some jerk to the ground
‘Cause he copped a feel as you walked by

I can hear you now talkin' to your friends
Sayin' yeah girls he’s come a long way
From draggin' his knuckles and carryin' a club
And buildin' a fire in a cave
But when you say a backrub means only a backrub
Then you swat my hand when I try
Well now what can I say at the end of the day
Honey, I’m still a guy

And I’ll pour out my heart
Hold your hand in the car
Write a love song that makes you cry
Then turn right around
Knock some jerk to the ground
‘Cause he copped a feel as you walked by

These days there’s dudes gettin' facials
Manicured, waxed, and botoxed
But with deep spray on tans and creamy lotioney hands
You cain’t grip a tackle box
Yeah, with all of these men linin' up to get neutered
It’s hip now to be feminized
But, I don’t highlight my hair
I’ve still got a pair
Yeah, honey I’m still a guy

Oh, my eyebrows ain’t plucked
Theres a gun in my truck
Oh Thank God, I’m still a guy
Yeah boy&lt;/i&gt;</content>
        <published>2008-12-16T00:09:17.414+01:00</published>
        <updated>2008-12-16T00:09:17.414+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1471492&amp;comment_id=139363664</id>
        <title>Quote:I don't mind if my guy h</title>
        <author>
            <name>DesertFox</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1471492&amp;comment_id=139363664"/>
        <content>Quote:I don't mind if my guy has stubble, but I prefer it when he shaves smooth except for his goatee. Guess it depends on what you grew up with though. In my family all the men were well groomed as they are all white collar and it was what was expected...and that is what I prefer. Aha! a PRISS! a GOODY TWO SHOES! MISS MANNERLY! In my family we washed once a month whether we need it or not. We sweat all day in the hot sun, digging ditches on the chain gang. The gals used to hang around to watch the sweat roll down our tanned bellies, some of them racing over with mouths open to catch the beads that dripped ...

Wait. That's my Wyatt mode. 

Yeah, I never cared much for stubble, myself. Itches and looks unsightly.</content>
        <published>2008-10-09T00:07:00.712+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-10-09T00:07:00.712+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1461643&amp;comment_id=139357707</id>
        <title>Quote:Originally Posted by Des</title>
        <author>
            <name>HooverWasRight</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1461643&amp;comment_id=139357707"/>
        <content>Quote:Originally Posted by DesertFox&lt;a href="showthread.php?s=7fdf5bf9ebd2baea90f29ff038bd421b&amp;p=694263#post694263" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;What Homes said.

What Maggie said.

What Penguin said.

McCain is back-and-forth on important conservative issues. He can't be trusted, and that's worst of all.McCain is another dick from Arizona...but I wouldn't mention the other one.</content>
        <published>2009-09-01T17:49:27.705+02:00</published>
        <updated>2009-09-01T17:49:27.705+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1461643&amp;comment_id=139357703</id>
        <title>Quote:Originally Posted by Elg</title>
        <author>
            <name>MSGT</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1461643&amp;comment_id=139357703"/>
        <content>Quote:Originally Posted by Elgalad&lt;a href="showthread.php?s=7fdf5bf9ebd2baea90f29ff038bd421b&amp;p=694266#post694266" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;McCain is not a Conservative.True

Quote:Originally Posted by Elgalad&lt;a href="showthread.php?s=7fdf5bf9ebd2baea90f29ff038bd421b&amp;p=694266#post694266" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;A McCain Presidency is not the "lesser" of two evils.  Evil = Evil.disagree...A lie isn't the same as murder. There are degrees of evil.

Quote:Originally Posted by Elgalad&lt;a href="showthread.php?s=7fdf5bf9ebd2baea90f29ff038bd421b&amp;p=694266#post694266" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;No matter who is elected, there will still be a United States of America in 2012.True, but what will it look like in 2012.


Quote:Originally Posted by Elgalad&lt;a href="showthread.php?s=7fdf5bf9ebd2baea90f29ff038bd421b&amp;p=694266#post694266" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;-ElgaladI thought your name would be green by now</content>
        <published>2009-06-09T13:02:21.324+02:00</published>
        <updated>2009-06-09T13:02:21.324+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1461643&amp;comment_id=139357702</id>
        <title>Quote:Originally Posted by Mag</title>
        <author>
            <name>Beowulf</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1461643&amp;comment_id=139357702"/>
        <content>Quote:Originally Posted by Maggie_T&lt;a href="showthread.php?s=7fdf5bf9ebd2baea90f29ff038bd421b&amp;p=694238#post694238" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Well, maybe that's what it will take to wake the American people up.  There is a saying in Spanish: &lt;i&gt;La letra con sangre entra&lt;/i&gt;.  Which losely translated means &lt;i&gt;Nothing teaches like pain&lt;/i&gt;.

Maybe when Americans are given a taste of Marxism, they will wake up and realize what happens when they lose that which they always took for granted.

Yes, it will mean hard times.  I'm betting on the American people's resilience to bounce back from tragedies like the Great Depression, WWI-WWII, Carter, and maybe Obama.

And if that does not wake them up, well, then we might as well know it sooner than later, and learn to tackle the problem.
Yes, Maggie, that IS what it will take. When the Libs who voted him into office see their own taxes skyrocketing, the IRS bullying them over it, their gas costing $6/gallon and progress completely halted in favor of saving a critter that doesn't need saving, then maybe they'll realize they screwed up. I think the tax part will be enough. Last I knew, anyone who gets hit in the wallet is giving the assailant their undivided attention.</content>
        <published>2009-06-09T13:02:02.278+02:00</published>
        <updated>2009-06-09T13:02:02.278+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1461643&amp;comment_id=139357697</id>
        <title>McCain is not a Conservative. </title>
        <author>
            <name>Elgalad</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1461643&amp;comment_id=139357697"/>
        <content>McCain is not a Conservative.  

A McCain Presidency is not the "lesser" of two evils.  Evil = Evil.

No matter who is elected, there will still be a United States of America in 2012.


-Elgalad</content>
        <published>2009-06-09T13:01:26.407+02:00</published>
        <updated>2009-06-09T13:01:26.407+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1461643&amp;comment_id=139357696</id>
        <title>So we just forget about Obama?</title>
        <author>
            <name>Suzie</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1461643&amp;comment_id=139357696"/>
        <content>So we just forget about Obama? I notice no one ever seems to mention him. We can list all of McCain's flaws in this thread and not discuss the article at all, but Obama is still going to win ... then what?</content>
        <published>2009-06-09T13:01:16.407+02:00</published>
        <updated>2009-06-09T13:01:16.407+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1461643&amp;comment_id=139357695</id>
        <title>What Homes said.

What Maggie </title>
        <author>
            <name>DesertFox</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1461643&amp;comment_id=139357695"/>
        <content>What Homes said.

What Maggie said.

What Penguin said.

McCain is back-and-forth on important conservative issues. He can't be trusted, and that's worst of all.</content>
        <published>2009-06-09T13:01:06.407+02:00</published>
        <updated>2009-06-09T13:01:06.407+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1461643&amp;comment_id=139357692</id>
        <title>Quote:McCain’s defeat by the l</title>
        <author>
            <name>Naturalized-Texan</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1461643&amp;comment_id=139357692"/>
        <content>Quote:McCain’s defeat by the liberal Obama and the advent of a strengthened Democratic Congress would mark the end of the modern conservative era...Absolutely! And conservatism may never return during the lifetime of anyone who is posting here.</content>
        <published>2009-06-09T13:00:56.407+02:00</published>
        <updated>2009-06-09T13:00:56.407+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1461643&amp;comment_id=139357690</id>
        <title>McCain and his sycophants woul</title>
        <author>
            <name>Penguin</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1461643&amp;comment_id=139357690"/>
        <content>McCain and his sycophants would not need to keep talking about how "conservative" he is if he actually was a conservative. Actions speak louder than words and the kicking and yelling by he and his minions only mocks the whole movement.</content>
        <published>2009-06-09T13:00:46.407+02:00</published>
        <updated>2009-06-09T13:00:46.407+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1461643&amp;comment_id=139357689</id>
        <title>I am not that optimistic. 

St</title>
        <author>
            <name>Suzie</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1461643&amp;comment_id=139357689"/>
        <content>I am not that optimistic. 

Still, no one seems able to explain just how much we have to lose or what they are willing to sacrifice. Do we want it to come to war on our own soil because he thinks he can "talk" anyone out of killing us all ... tying the military's hands so they become targets and not defense?  The stakes are a whole lot bigger than at any time in our nations history and enemies scattered across many lands waiting for another shot at us. We can lose a lot. People are fed up with the healthcare and are ready to jump on board and we know it will pass. The "Children's healthcare program" would have passed if Bush hadn't vetoed it. If they  suck people into social programs in an industry where many people have had problems they are sold on it quick and that won't go away any faster than welfare ... food stamps... hud and all those other things. And on top of that no limits on killing the unborn.

You can't recover things that are completely destroyed. And I am afraid that is where we are heading.</content>
        <published>2009-06-09T13:00:36.407+02:00</published>
        <updated>2009-06-09T13:00:36.407+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1461643&amp;comment_id=139357687</id>
        <title>(shrug)  As I said, better kno</title>
        <author>
            <name>Maggie_T</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1461643&amp;comment_id=139357687"/>
        <content>(shrug)  As I said, better know it sooner than later.  As Kathy30 said, Jimmy Carter gave us Ronald Reagan.  Maybe HUSSEIN will have the same results.

Hey, I'm being optimistic, for once.</content>
        <published>2009-06-09T13:00:26.407+02:00</published>
        <updated>2009-06-09T13:00:26.407+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1461643&amp;comment_id=139357686</id>
        <title>WV is still waiting for that m</title>
        <author>
            <name>Suzie</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1461643&amp;comment_id=139357686"/>
        <content>WV is still waiting for that maybe. 50 years of Democrats later and Conservatives no longer bother to run. I don't want to see the whole country become what this state has. No one will run under any conservative positions here because no one votes for any one who tries it, even if they have fewer conservative leanings than McCain so why would anyone bother to run if no one voted for the last guy who at least offered that. If they wont even vote against unrestricted abortion here once it happens nation wide we are doomed. They have their social programs and they want to keep them. Which is what we got with Roosevelt, and Obama has his healthcare New Deal.</content>
        <published>2009-06-09T13:00:16.407+02:00</published>
        <updated>2009-06-09T13:00:16.407+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1461643&amp;comment_id=139357684</id>
        <title>Well, maybe that's what it wil</title>
        <author>
            <name>Maggie_T</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1461643&amp;comment_id=139357684"/>
        <content>Well, maybe that's what it will take to wake the American people up.  There is a saying in Spanish: &lt;i&gt;La letra con sangre entra&lt;/i&gt;.  Which losely translated means &lt;i&gt;Nothing teaches like pain&lt;/i&gt;.

Maybe when Americans are given a taste of Marxism, they will wake up and realize what happens when they lose that which they always took for granted.

Yes, it will mean hard times.  I'm betting on the American people's resilience to bounce back from tragedies like the Great Depression, WWI-WWII, Carter, and maybe Obama.

And if that does not wake them up, well, then we might as well know it sooner than later, and learn to tackle the problem.</content>
        <published>2009-06-09T13:00:06.407+02:00</published>
        <updated>2009-06-09T13:00:06.407+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1461643&amp;comment_id=139357682</id>
        <title>Quote:McCain’s defeat by the l</title>
        <author>
            <name>Suzie</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1461643&amp;comment_id=139357682"/>
        <content>Quote:McCain’s defeat by the liberal Obama and the advent of a strengthened Democratic Congress would mark the end of the modern conservative era as clearly as President Franklin Roosevelt’s defeat of President Herbert Hoover in 1932 marked the end of the conservative 1920s.My greatest fear.</content>
        <published>2009-06-09T12:59:56.407+02:00</published>
        <updated>2009-06-09T12:59:56.407+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1461643&amp;comment_id=139357681</id>
        <title>Quote:&lt;b&gt;Splintered conservati</title>
        <author>
            <name>Maggie_T</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1461643&amp;comment_id=139357681"/>
        <content>Quote:&lt;b&gt;Splintered conservatives hurt McCain&lt;/b&gt;CORRECTION: McCain splinters conservatives and he hurts conservatism.</content>
        <published>2009-06-09T12:59:46.407+02:00</published>
        <updated>2009-06-09T12:59:46.407+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1461643&amp;comment_id=139357680</id>
        <title>&lt;b&gt;From the article cited:&lt;/b&gt;</title>
        <author>
            <name>HomeschoolrsRUs</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1461643&amp;comment_id=139357680"/>
        <content>&lt;b&gt;From the article cited:&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;i&gt;McCain’s problem with the Republican base is not his lack of conservative credentials. &lt;/i&gt;

Yes it is.
&lt;b&gt;From the article cited:&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;i&gt;McCain is not a phony or apostate conservative. &lt;/i&gt;

Yes he is.

But that's just my opinion,</content>
        <published>2009-06-09T12:59:36.407+02:00</published>
        <updated>2009-06-09T12:59:36.407+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1461643&amp;comment_id=139357679</id>
        <title>&lt;b&gt;Splintered conservatives hu</title>
        <author>
            <name>Suzie</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1461643&amp;comment_id=139357679"/>
        <content>&lt;b&gt;Splintered conservatives hurt McCain&lt;/b&gt;



                                                    By ALLAN J. LICHTMAN  |                         6/24/08 4:49 AM  EST                                                                           
                          Text Size: &lt;a href="http://javascript%3Cb%3E%3C/b%3E:decreaseFontSize%28.25%29;" &gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://javascript%3Cb%3E%3C/b%3E:resetFontSize%28%29;" &gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://javascript%3Cb%3E%3C/b%3E:increaseFontSize%28.25%29;" &gt;&lt;/a&gt;       
       
                                                                          With &lt;a href="http://search.politico.com/results.cfm?subject=United+States" &gt;America&lt;/a&gt;’s attention riveted on the battle between &lt;a href="http://search.politico.com/results.cfm?subject=Barack+Obama" &gt;Barack Obama&lt;/a&gt; and Hillary Rodham Clinton, few noticed that presumptive Republican nominee &lt;a href="http://search.politico.com/results.cfm?subject=John+McCain" &gt;John McCain&lt;/a&gt; limped through his party’s late primaries. McCain won 73 percent of the vote in Pennsylvania, 72 percent in Kentucky, 70 percent in Idaho and 70 percent in South Dakota.

McCain’s problem with the Republican base is not his lack of conservative credentials. The Arizona senator’s 82 percent lifetime rating from The American Conservative Union is roughly comparable to the 86 percent rating for former Tennessee senator and 2008 GOP presidential candidate Fred Thompson, once the object of conservative dreams. Barack Obama’s rating during his brief Senate tenure is 8 percent.

But conservatives ultimately found Thompson and every other Republican candidate wanting. They have even turned on their onetime hero &lt;a href="http://search.politico.com/results.cfm?subject=George+W.+Bush" &gt;President Bush&lt;/a&gt;, a sure sign of a movement in disarray. In the unkindest cut of all, the late patriarch William F. Buckley said of Bush in 2006, “If you had a European prime minister who experienced what we’ve experienced, it would be expected that he would retire or resign.”

The problem for conservatives, as I explain in my new book, “White Protestant Nation: The Rise of the American Conservative Movement” (Grove/Atlantic, 2008), is more fundamental than failed leadership. Rather, the conservative era that began in 1980 is coming to an end, the victim not of liberal pounding but of contradictions from within.

Conservatives triumphed in 1980 in the wake of the liberal failure to meet the challenges of a declining economy and heightened threats from abroad. But conservatives also won the battle of ideas. They called for a “colorblind society” to replace the liberals’ racial spoils system of quotas and special privileges for minorities. They proposed market solutions to social and economic problems and promised to ease taxes and regulations that discouraged working and investing. Conservatives pledged to rebuild America’s defenses and confront foreign enemies from a position of strength.

The movement conservatives of the Reagan era rejected gradual change and sought to smash the liberal order and restore America’s commitment to traditional moral values, private enterprise and robust anti-communism. In their pursuit of power, conservatives could count on the resources of business and a coordinated movement of intellectuals, publicists, lobbyists, educators, business leaders, journalists, preachers, talk show hosts and grass-roots activists. During the 1970s, conservatives built the Heritage Foundation, the Conservative Caucus, the National Conservative Political Action Committee, the Free Congress Foundation, Concerned Women for America, the Moral Majority and Focus on the Family.

&lt;a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/11280.html" &gt;&lt;/a&gt; 

McCain is not a phony or apostate conservative. Rather, he is the heir to contradictions that have now splintered the once vibrant conservative movement beyond easy repair. McCain’s backing for nation building in Iraq — arguably the largest federal social engineering project in U.S. history — the Bush tax cuts and a robust national bureaucracy for homeland security undercuts his rhetorical support for limited government, fiscal responsibility and states’ rights. 
&lt;a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/11275.html" &gt;MORE HERE&lt;/a&gt;

Lots of splinters.</content>
        <published>2009-06-09T12:59:26.407+02:00</published>
        <updated>2009-06-09T12:59:26.407+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1475427&amp;comment_id=139352429</id>
        <title>Personally I think it's not li</title>
        <author>
            <name>gnome</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1475427&amp;comment_id=139352429"/>
        <content>Personally I think it's not likely to be a serious problem.  Seriously, can you imagine an underage kid looking for naughty content on the web turning up HERE to get their kicks?

Even underage, if they're interested enough in American politics to look around they can probably handle anything that's within the rules here.  Relying on parental control should suffice.</content>
        <published>2008-07-03T00:20:26.284+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-07-03T00:20:26.284+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1475427&amp;comment_id=139352428</id>
        <title>Prez,
I, for one, agree with y</title>
        <author>
            <name>BarryC</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1475427&amp;comment_id=139352428"/>
        <content>Prez,
I, for one, agree with you, though I don't know how it could be enforced. Personally I have a problem with all cussing, or language that could be construed as such. I'm surprised to see some of it here, but I figure I'm a relative newcomer, so I keep my mouth shut on it. But I don't understand why, after you made your suggestion, others jumped all over you about it. That wasn't right.

Anyway, your idea makes sense to me. Just my opinion.
Thanks

P.S.- All types of foul language, or cusswords, or forbidden where I work. But the rule is completely ignored and unenforced. So I hear it all. So I'm kind of used to it.</content>
        <published>2008-07-03T00:20:18.284+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-07-03T00:20:18.284+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1475427&amp;comment_id=139352427</id>
        <title>"Am I the only one seeing iron</title>
        <author>
            <name>Wolfcounsel</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1475427&amp;comment_id=139352427"/>
        <content>"Am I the only one seeing irony here?" --TeenageRepublican

Probably not, Grasshopper.  But mine is deliberate and pre-meditated drawing out mental Nin-Jitsu.</content>
        <published>2008-07-03T00:20:10.284+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-07-03T00:20:10.284+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1475427&amp;comment_id=139352426</id>
        <title>"Fine." --PrezLeefun

OOOOH, y</title>
        <author>
            <name>Wolfcounsel</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1475427&amp;comment_id=139352426"/>
        <content>"Fine." --PrezLeefun

OOOOH, you are lucky we are not related!  One of my granddaughters answered her grandma in that fashion.  I made her write 500 times she would not answer in that fashion ever again.  This was after her grandma spanked her and made her sweep the entire house.</content>
        <published>2008-07-03T00:19:48.950+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-07-03T00:19:48.950+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1475427&amp;comment_id=139352425</id>
        <title>"It was mean of you to come at</title>
        <author>
            <name>Wolfcounsel</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1475427&amp;comment_id=139352425"/>
        <content>"It was mean of you to come at me without cause in the first place." --PrezLeefun

Don't push it, Grasshopper!

I'm sorry!</content>
        <published>2008-07-03T00:19:28.950+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-07-03T00:19:28.950+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1475427&amp;comment_id=139352424</id>
        <title>"Seriously though, age require</title>
        <author>
            <name>Wolfcounsel</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1475427&amp;comment_id=139352424"/>
        <content>"Seriously though, age requirements are pretty much impossible to enforce on a message board." --GreatDredScott

I'll say! I was once mistaken for a 10 year old on a certain tubey video site.

Also.  That was mean of me to suggest you leave the forum, Prez.  Cancel that suggestion.</content>
        <published>2008-07-03T00:18:57.284+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-07-03T00:18:57.284+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1475427&amp;comment_id=139352423</id>
        <title>Quote:Originally Posted by Wol</title>
        <author>
            <name>GreatDredScott</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1475427&amp;comment_id=139352423"/>
        <content>Quote:Originally Posted by Wolfcounsel&lt;a href="showthread.php?s=7fdf5bf9ebd2baea90f29ff038bd421b&amp;p=696930#post696930" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Where is the proof?  A credit card?  A picture ID scanned and sent with a notarized stamp verifying it was not photoshopped?  A true copy of a birth certificate?
Yep, all of the above, plus the signatures of at least three people who will swear that you are the age you say you are. Of course, those people must also show such documentation. Fingerprints should be kept on file in case of forgery.  

Seriously though, age requirements are pretty much impossible to enforce on a message board.</content>
        <published>2008-07-03T00:18:49.784+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-07-03T00:18:49.784+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1475427&amp;comment_id=139352422</id>
        <title>"Perhaps Wolfie you reading wa</title>
        <author>
            <name>Wolfcounsel</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1475427&amp;comment_id=139352422"/>
        <content>"Perhaps Wolfie you reading way too far into my posts. I am making a suggestion for us all to discuss. Clearly I am outnumbered. 

But I am entitled to my opinion. I am free to voice it regardless of whether or not you like it. &lt;b&gt;I have demanded nothing in this thread.&lt;/b&gt; I only made a suggestion. Perhaps some of the young people here are being more mature than you. What reason do you have to snap at me?" --PrezLeefun, bold mine




Really?  Look: "&lt;b&gt;I want&lt;/b&gt; some standard to block kids from being here." --PrezLeefun

would have sounded better had you worded it like, "May I suggest some standard..." 

Now, &lt;b&gt;I want you to leave well enough alone&lt;/b&gt;.  According to you, that also is not a demand.  Take it any way you like.</content>
        <published>2008-07-03T00:18:12.284+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-07-03T00:18:12.284+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1475427&amp;comment_id=139352421</id>
        <title>Quote:Originally Posted by Pre</title>
        <author>
            <name>TeenageRepublican</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1475427&amp;comment_id=139352421"/>
        <content>Quote:Originally Posted by PrezLeefun&lt;a href="showthread.php?s=7fdf5bf9ebd2baea90f29ff038bd421b&amp;p=696906#post696906" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Hi everyone. I know we dont have our own age restrictions because the site is open for everyone to post and be involved in political discussion, but I think we need to make an age restriction of our own. 

Some content here, that is put up by posters, even though it doesn't break our rules is flat out inappropriate for kids. And even though we have a few bright young members here I don't think we should allow more young people on here when we have some posts that contain graphic (violent) photos, graphic language (I know we have a language filter but it doesn't take a genius to figure out what someone is saying), and Wyatt. (just kidding) But seriously I think we should probably make a new minimum age requirement.I didn't even have a problem with this until you mentioned it, but I do see your concern.
I think the only word here that gets filtered is the "F" word. I maybe totally wrong, but what else would "What the ****" be? The "L" word?
I'll have to think about this some more.</content>
        <published>2008-07-03T00:18:02.284+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-07-03T00:18:02.284+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1484652&amp;comment_id=139350887</id>
        <title>"I fail to see how your food t</title>
        <author>
            <name>Wolfcounsel</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1484652&amp;comment_id=139350887"/>
        <content>"I fail to see how your food tastes make you a racist. I swear...the world is going to hell in a shopping cart..." --LivingDeadGirl

The wise people of this world have spoken, and now the rest of the world will kiss their asses, or they will be branded &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;persona non grata&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; in the politically correct world they have created.  Get used to it, or commence the ass-kicking upon those weenies.  Start with the race card holders.</content>
        <published>2009-06-09T17:47:05.002+02:00</published>
        <updated>2009-06-09T17:47:05.002+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1484652&amp;comment_id=139350886</id>
        <title>Quote:Originally Posted by Tee</title>
        <author>
            <name>PrezLeefun</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1484652&amp;comment_id=139350886"/>
        <content>Quote:Originally Posted by TeenageRepublican&lt;a href="showthread.php?s=7fdf5bf9ebd2baea90f29ff038bd421b&amp;p=698851#post698851" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;I wonder if hating fried chicken means you're racist...
Just kidding... I do hate fried chicken though...Only if you hate watermelon too.... do ya? well do ya punk?</content>
        <published>2008-07-08T16:57:07.663+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-07-08T16:57:07.663+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1484652&amp;comment_id=139350885</id>
        <title>I wonder if hating fried chick</title>
        <author>
            <name>TeenageRepublican</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1484652&amp;comment_id=139350885"/>
        <content>I wonder if hating fried chicken means you're racist...
Just kidding... I do hate fried chicken though...</content>
        <published>2008-07-08T16:56:47.663+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-07-08T16:56:47.663+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1484652&amp;comment_id=139350884</id>
        <title>What about girls who don't lik</title>
        <author>
            <name>PrezLeefun</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1484652&amp;comment_id=139350884"/>
        <content>What about girls who don't like tacos? Are they racist homophobics?


For the record I like both.</content>
        <published>2008-07-08T16:55:50.997+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-07-08T16:55:50.997+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1455690&amp;comment_id=139323164</id>
        <title>Quote:Originally Posted by hos</title>
        <author>
            <name>Neil Peart</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1455690&amp;comment_id=139323164"/>
        <content>Quote:Originally Posted by hosl&lt;a href="showthread.php?s=b14573315b173961a2776f6f24807a33&amp;p=693868#post693868" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;On the "to watch" list:
Red DawnYES. You MUST see this movie.</content>
        <published>2008-11-10T04:55:07.615+01:00</published>
        <updated>2008-11-10T04:55:07.615+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1455690&amp;comment_id=139323160</id>
        <title>Boogie Nights (5/5)
Zohan (2/5</title>
        <author>
            <name>hosl</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1455690&amp;comment_id=139323160"/>
        <content>Boogie Nights (5/5)
Zohan (2/5)
Kung Fu Panda (3.5/5)

On the "to watch" list:
Get Smart
Wanted
Falling Down
Hoop Dreams
Red Dawn</content>
        <published>2008-10-11T05:47:15.003+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-10-11T05:47:15.003+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1455690&amp;comment_id=139323154</id>
        <title>Quote:Originally Posted by Tre</title>
        <author>
            <name>hosl</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1455690&amp;comment_id=139323154"/>
        <content>Quote:Originally Posted by Trevelyan&lt;a href="showthread.php?s=b14573315b173961a2776f6f24807a33&amp;p=683410#post683410" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;b&gt; "Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull" &lt;/b&gt;  *** out of four.

Fun, but it is the weakest of the four movies.I have to agree, however I give it 4.5/5</content>
        <published>2008-06-23T05:17:18.757+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-06-23T05:17:18.757+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1455690&amp;comment_id=139323151</id>
        <title>&lt;b&gt; "Indiana Jones and the Kin</title>
        <author>
            <name>Trevelyan</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1455690&amp;comment_id=139323151"/>
        <content>&lt;b&gt; "Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull" &lt;/b&gt;  *** out of four.

Fun, but it is the weakest of the four movies.</content>
        <published>2008-06-23T05:16:57.091+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-06-23T05:16:57.091+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1455690&amp;comment_id=139323147</id>
        <title>Quote:Originally Posted by Des</title>
        <author>
            <name>ThomasMore</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1455690&amp;comment_id=139323147"/>
        <content>Quote:Originally Posted by DesertFox&lt;a href="showthread.php?s=b14573315b173961a2776f6f24807a33&amp;p=680768#post680768" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Just watched &lt;i&gt;Gladiator&lt;/i&gt; for the 1200th time. It's still good.Fox, did you ever see Anthony Mann's "&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fall_of_the_Roman_Empire_%28film%29" &gt;&lt;b&gt;Fall of the Roman Empire&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;"?  

About a year after "Gladiator" hit the theaters, I saw FotRE on late-night television.  Ridley Scott obviously got his inspiration for "Gladiator" from it; at least 80% of it came from FotRE; it was a well-made epic.



A luscious Sophia Loren portrayed Lucilla, Alec Guinness was Marcus Aurelius, and Christopher Plummer was the charismatic, but mad Commodus.  Omar Sharif, James Mason, Mel Ferrer and Anthony Quayle also performed.  Steven Boyd's wooden Livius (reformulated in Gladiator as Russell Crowe's Maximus) was the film's weak spot.</content>
        <published>2008-06-23T05:16:49.591+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-06-23T05:16:49.591+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1455690&amp;comment_id=139323142</id>
        <title>Prince Caspian

4 out of 4

Gr</title>
        <author>
            <name>LivingDeadGirl</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1455690&amp;comment_id=139323142"/>
        <content>Prince Caspian

4 out of 4

Great story, wonderful effects...kept a 7 and a 10 year old enraptured for the entire thing.  Kept the 5 year old pretty well entertained for 1/2...and that takes A LOT to do!!</content>
        <published>2008-06-23T05:16:22.091+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-06-23T05:16:22.091+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1455690&amp;comment_id=139323138</id>
        <title>Children of Men: 2/5

Stupid e</title>
        <author>
            <name>Wyatt_Junker</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1455690&amp;comment_id=139323138"/>
        <content>Children of Men: 2/5

Stupid ending.

I would have much preferred to see the pregnant chick at the end be all pro-choice and be like SCREW YOU and get an abortion just to spite the director and all those bad actors.

She aborts.  The world ends.  Simple.

My favorite scene was when Michael Caine asked the revolutionaries to pull his finger and they just blow it off instead.  That scene had potential.

Another good ending would have been the black chick with child gets picked up by the boat that says TOMORROW on the starboard side.  Now, follow me.  Number one, she's kind of cute.  Sailors like that.  Number two, they need to figger out why her womb is so badass.  So?  How about a sailor gang bang?  

She gets on the boat and they take turns.  I mean, its for a good cause right?  They need to populate the earth again and only her womb works.  So, party-time.</content>
        <published>2008-06-23T05:16:12.091+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-06-23T05:16:12.091+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1469932&amp;comment_id=139316746</id>
        <title>Quote:Originally Posted by Suz</title>
        <author>
            <name>M.C.</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1469932&amp;comment_id=139316746"/>
        <content>Quote:Originally Posted by Suzie&lt;a href="showthread.php?s=9789ed77e874d4239d3170d785b4b0e8&amp;p=696117#post696117" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;I don't know where you are going but you need to look someplace else for women. Its this whole "metrosexual" (gay straight men) idiotic phase going on in the 18-29 age bracket.  It really is making men completely not masculine and its quite sickening.  Apparently gays are AWESOME, and all straight guys should be hairless with faggy haircuts.  Not saying I have no luck with the ladies, but there are many more of them looking for gay straight guys than actual MEN.

It might be a regional fad, I know its probably in Cali as well as all of the Northeast, but idk I assume its elsewhere as well.</content>
        <published>2009-09-24T07:59:08.858+02:00</published>
        <updated>2009-09-24T07:59:08.858+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1469932&amp;comment_id=139316745</id>
        <title>Quote:&lt;a href="http://www.free</title>
        <author>
            <name>Suzie</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1469932&amp;comment_id=139316745"/>
        <content>Quote:&lt;a href="http://www.freeconservatives.com/vb/member.php?u=3552" &gt;&lt;/a&gt; 

Join Date: May 2007
 Location: Connecticut
   Posts: 655 


 Pretty much every girl I have ever met likes a clean shave. Lots of them even like men who shave their chests(lol not manly). I still have stubble though because I think it just screams "America." Don't know why, but I think facial hair can make even a boy a real man.I don't know where you are going but you need to look someplace else for women.</content>
        <published>2009-07-25T00:29:12.822+02:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-25T00:29:12.822+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1469932&amp;comment_id=139316744</id>
        <title>I have 5 o'clock, 10 o'clock a</title>
        <author>
            <name>Penguin</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1469932&amp;comment_id=139316744"/>
        <content>I have 5 o'clock, 10 o'clock and 12am shadows all of the time. And all of that is the result of laziness, not because of going for the "Clooney" look and all of that HollyScum rotgut.</content>
        <published>2009-05-24T16:59:16.786+02:00</published>
        <updated>2009-05-24T16:59:16.786+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1469932&amp;comment_id=139316743</id>
        <title>Pretty much every girl I have </title>
        <author>
            <name>M.C.</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1469932&amp;comment_id=139316743"/>
        <content>Pretty much every girl I have ever met likes a clean shave.  Lots of them even like men who shave their chests(lol not manly).  I still have stubble though because I think it just screams "America."  Don't know why, but I think facial hair can make even a boy a real man.</content>
        <published>2009-03-24T08:29:20.750+01:00</published>
        <updated>2009-03-24T08:29:20.750+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1469932&amp;comment_id=139316742</id>
        <title>Quote:Originally Posted by Eve</title>
        <author>
            <name>GreatDredScott</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1469932&amp;comment_id=139316742"/>
        <content>Quote:Originally Posted by EveningStar&lt;a href="showthread.php?s=9789ed77e874d4239d3170d785b4b0e8&amp;p=696094#post696094" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Who?
American Idol.  David Cook beat out "Archie" (David Archuleta) this past season.</content>
        <published>2008-06-30T05:09:44.250+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-06-30T05:09:44.250+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1469932&amp;comment_id=139316741</id>
        <title>Quote:experts in human evoluti</title>
        <author>
            <name>DesertFox</name>
        </author>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.cocomment.com/sidebar?context=explore&amp;object=sites&amp;mode=detail&amp;id=302230&amp;conv=1469932&amp;comment_id=139316741"/>
        <content>Quote:experts in human evolution say that that facial hair may be a signal of aggression because it boosts the apparent size of the lower jaw, emphasising the teeth as weapons. This is the best "experts in evolution" can do? I'd say that stubble is a sure sign of manhood. Since in early history most boys died young (as most girls), stubble meant having survived to manhood, meaning that the dude's genes were desirable since survivability would presumably be heritable.

That reasoning wouldn't apply to blacks are American Indians, pure strains of which don't grow stubble or have hairy bods.</content>
        <published>2008-06-30T05:08:34.250+02:00</published>
        <updated>2008-06-30T05:08:34.250+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
</feed>
